Is it currently possible to combine multiple hccap files with different essids? Or pass several hccap files at the same time to ocl+? For example if I have 3 essids to test and I only want to run through the dictionary list once vs 3 times. Similar to where you have 100 NTLM hashes in the same file and it does them all at once?
↧
Multiple WPA hccap files at the same time.
↧
jtr --format=raw-md5u
hashcat have similar mode in JTR?
--format=raw-md5u
no salts (md5(unicode($p)) [128x1 (MD5_Body)])
--format=raw-md5u
no salts (md5(unicode($p)) [128x1 (MD5_Body)])
↧
↧
SL3, but no respone
I tried following line, but get no response. I don't know what I'm doing wrong. Please help. Thanks in advance!!
cudaHashcat-lite64 -m 1900 -n 800 -1 00010203040506070809 --outfile=out.txt 0C100113B2A8034485B6A2122074B6D9453F16FA:003543490495460900 ?1?1?1?1?1?1?1?1?1?1?1?1?1?1?
cudaHashcat-lite v0.15 by atom starting...
Password lengths: 1 - 54
Watchdog: Temperature abort trigger set to 90c
Watchdog: Temperature retain trigger set to 80c
Device #1: GeForce GTX 550 Ti, 1023MB, 1800Mhz, 4MCU
Usage: cudaHashcat-lite [options]... hash [mask]
Try --help for more help.
cudaHashcat-lite64 -m 1900 -n 800 -1 00010203040506070809 --outfile=out.txt 0C100113B2A8034485B6A2122074B6D9453F16FA:003543490495460900 ?1?1?1?1?1?1?1?1?1?1?1?1?1?1?
cudaHashcat-lite v0.15 by atom starting...
Password lengths: 1 - 54
Watchdog: Temperature abort trigger set to 90c
Watchdog: Temperature retain trigger set to 80c
Device #1: GeForce GTX 550 Ti, 1023MB, 1800Mhz, 4MCU
Usage: cudaHashcat-lite [options]... hash [mask]
Try --help for more help.
↧
9600 GT vs 9800 GTX+
I've had these 9800 GTX+ cards sitting around for a while that were said to not work properly when I got them. I decided to replace my 9600 GT card with the faster 9800 GTX+ to see if it would work. After a few crashes, BSODs, downgrading drivers a bit, and reflashing the BIOS of the card it seems to be a bit more stable now.
I wanted some way to test it all, and for whatever reason oclHashcat popped in my head and I gave it a go. Logically speaking the 9800 GTX+ should outperform the 9600 GT I have in every aspect except it only has 512 MB of VRAM as opposed to my 9600 GT which has 1 GB.
I ran the cudaHashcat example 0 on both cards. The 9600 GT got near 200 M/s whereas the 9800 GTX+ only got a little over 100 M/s. Now perhaps I'm reading it backwards, but is that supposed to happen? What's making the difference, is it because my 9800 GTX+ is likely bad, or is it because of having less VRAM?
I'm sorry if this is kind of unrelated to the purpose of oclHashcat, but it seems like it would be a great program for testing a GPU. Any insight is greatly appreciated.
I wanted some way to test it all, and for whatever reason oclHashcat popped in my head and I gave it a go. Logically speaking the 9800 GTX+ should outperform the 9600 GT I have in every aspect except it only has 512 MB of VRAM as opposed to my 9600 GT which has 1 GB.
I ran the cudaHashcat example 0 on both cards. The 9600 GT got near 200 M/s whereas the 9800 GTX+ only got a little over 100 M/s. Now perhaps I'm reading it backwards, but is that supposed to happen? What's making the difference, is it because my 9800 GTX+ is likely bad, or is it because of having less VRAM?
I'm sorry if this is kind of unrelated to the purpose of oclHashcat, but it seems like it would be a great program for testing a GPU. Any insight is greatly appreciated.
↧
Sapphire HD7970 Reference Design
I am not new to oclHashcat or JtR, but lost, cause I want to build an Ubuntu based machine running oclHashcat-plus. I am using Macs for 25 years now, but being pretty new to built your own PC. I am using my friends vanilla PC with Ubuntu for general purpose work, so I am kind of familiar with setting up.
The PC should not be too expensive, I have decided to use one Sapphire Radeon HD7970. Have been reading about "reference design" and proper cooling but I am still not sure.
Would this one
http://www.amazon.de/gp/product/B006TX48...il_1p_1_ti
be a good decision? Amazon recomends a "newer" model
http://www.amazon.de/Sapphire-Grafikkart...b_title_ce
Besides that I have to decide on Mainboard and CPU. As far as I understand CPU power is not that important, could be a cheaper one, right? The PC will only be used for Hashcat etc.
I would appreciate any help, best regards, vrposter
The PC should not be too expensive, I have decided to use one Sapphire Radeon HD7970. Have been reading about "reference design" and proper cooling but I am still not sure.
Would this one
http://www.amazon.de/gp/product/B006TX48...il_1p_1_ti
be a good decision? Amazon recomends a "newer" model
http://www.amazon.de/Sapphire-Grafikkart...b_title_ce
Besides that I have to decide on Mainboard and CPU. As far as I understand CPU power is not that important, could be a cheaper one, right? The PC will only be used for Hashcat etc.
I would appreciate any help, best regards, vrposter
↧
↧
First build, need opinions.
http://pcpartpicker.com/b/CHy
This is what I'm thinking about building at the moment, kinda new to building pc's so take it easy on me. Any opinions on if I should change anything? Basically just for cracking and some general gaming and what not. Only looking to spend $1500 on this build.
all opinions/suggestions are appreciated.
This is what I'm thinking about building at the moment, kinda new to building pc's so take it easy on me. Any opinions on if I should change anything? Basically just for cracking and some general gaming and what not. Only looking to spend $1500 on this build.
all opinions/suggestions are appreciated.
↧
Help me get the result, please.
Lock and Archive.
↧
oclHashcat-plus + Ubuntu Desktop 12.04 + AMD Radeon 7600M
Hi guys,
First off, and as this is my first post, thanks for Hashcat - what a tool! I work in infosec and use it pretty much, on every pentest.
Now, up until 8am this morning, I had a different laptop running a Nvidia GT 650 card and used optirun to run hashcat, worked fine. Then that laptop dissapeared.......long story!
Anyway, I now have a different laptop, a dell vostro with an AMD Radeon 7600 series - can i get hashcat working,,,,no!
The furthest ive got is this error:
mac [ ~/Tools/oclHashcat-plus-0.14 ]$ ./oclHashcat-plus64.bin -m 2500 /tmp/WPACAPTURE-01.CAP.HCCAP ~/Tools/Wordlists/rockyou.txt
ERROR: clGetDeviceIDs() -1
Now, I had a similar error to that before and it was due to a kernel not being found in the hashcat path, so i downloaded a new 7zip, from http://hashcat.net/files/oclHashcat-plus-0.14.7z and extracted with 7zip x oclHashcat-plus-0.14.7z, to make sure all kernels were there and in the correct path.....No dice!
So some output:
mac [ ~/Tools/oclHashcat-plus-0.14 ]$ clinfo
Number of platforms: 1
Platform Profile: FULL_PROFILE
Platform Version: OpenCL 1.2 AMD-APP (1084.2)
Platform Name: AMD Accelerated Parallel Processing
Platform Vendor: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
Platform Extensions: cl_khr_icd cl_amd_event_callback cl_amd_offline_devices
Platform Name: AMD Accelerated Parallel Processing
Number of devices: 1
Device Type: CL_DEVICE_TYPE_CPU
Device ID: 4098
Board name:
Max compute units: 4
Max work items dimensions: 3
Max work items[0]: 1024
Max work items[1]: 1024
Max work items[2]: 1024
Max work group size: 1024
Preferred vector width char: 16
Preferred vector width short: 8
Preferred vector width int: 4
Preferred vector width long: 2
Preferred vector width float: 8
Preferred vector width double: 4
Native vector width char: 16
Native vector width short: 8
Native vector width int: 4
Native vector width long: 2
Native vector width float: 8
Native vector width double: 4
Max clock frequency: 2501Mhz
Address bits: 64
Max memory allocation: 2147483648
Image support: Yes
Max number of images read arguments: 128
Max number of images write arguments: 8
Max image 2D width: 8192
Max image 2D height: 8192
Max image 3D width: 2048
Max image 3D height: 2048
Max image 3D depth: 2048
Max samplers within kernel: 16
Max size of kernel argument: 4096
Alignment (bits) of base address: 1024
Minimum alignment (bytes) for any datatype: 128
Single precision floating point capability
Denorms: Yes
Quiet NaNs: Yes
Round to nearest even: Yes
Round to zero: Yes
Round to +ve and infinity: Yes
IEEE754-2008 fused multiply-add: Yes
Cache type: Read/Write
Cache line size: 64
Cache size: 32768
Global memory size: 8243982336
Constant buffer size: 65536
Max number of constant args: 8
Local memory type: Global
Local memory size: 32768
Kernel Preferred work group size multiple: 1
Error correction support: 0
Unified memory for Host and Device: 1
Profiling timer resolution: 1
Device endianess: Little
Available: Yes
Compiler available: Yes
Execution capabilities:
Execute OpenCL kernels: Yes
Execute native function: Yes
Queue properties:
Out-of-Order: No
Profiling : Yes
Platform ID: 0x00007f0f3a411e00
Name: Intel® Core i5-3210M CPU @ 2.50GHz
Vendor: GenuineIntel
Device OpenCL C version: OpenCL C 1.2
Driver version: 1084.2 (sse2,avx)
Profile: FULL_PROFILE
Version: OpenCL 1.2 AMD-APP (1084.2)
Extensions: cl_khr_fp64 cl_amd_fp64 cl_khr_global_int32_base_atomics cl_khr_global_int32_extended_atomics cl_khr_local_int32_base_atomics cl_khr_local_int32_extended_atomics cl_khr_int64_base_atomics cl_khr_int64_extended_atomics cl_khr_3d_image_writes cl_khr_byte_addressable_store cl_khr_gl_sharing cl_ext_device_fission cl_amd_device_attribute_query cl_amd_vec3 cl_amd_printf cl_amd_media_ops cl_amd_popcnt
mac [ ~/Tools/oclHashcat-plus-0.14 ]$ dpkg-query --list | grep fglrx*
ii fglrx-amdcccle-experimental-9 2:9.010-0ubuntu0.3 Catalyst Control Center for the AMD graphics accelerators
ii fglrx-experimental-9 2:9.010-0ubuntu0.3 Experimental AMD binary Xorg driver and kernel module
mac [ ~/Tools/oclHashcat-plus-0.14 ]$ lspci | grep "VGA"
00:02.0 VGA compatible controller: Intel Corporation Ivy Bridge Graphics Controller (rev 09)
01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] nee ATI Thames XT/GL [Radeon HD 7600M Series]
mac [ ~/Tools/oclHashcat-plus-0.14 ]$ fglrxinfo
X Error of failed request: BadRequest (invalid request code or no such operation)
Major opcode of failed request: 154 (GLX)
Minor opcode of failed request: 19 (X_GLXQueryServerString)
Serial number of failed request: 12
Current serial number in output stream: 12
Now, this is the second attempt at getting this working. The first time, I went to amd and downloaded the catalyst driver and unpacked, chmod'd and executed. The gui popped up and i clicked on through. I then restarted ubuntu, as prompted, and ended up with a low graphics environment and basically borked the system. I managed to revert back to my previous xorg.conf, following the gui instructions; but it totally screwed up unity and I could barely get a shell to fix things. It left the whole laptop a bit unstable, so I reinstalled and with the output above, this is where I am now.
This time, ive installed the restricted driver from Ubuntu System Settings > Additional Drivers - i suspect this is what the problem is, but don't have the time to rebuild this laptop again, if the catalys install borks everything again.![Big Grin]( "Big Grin")
I know this isnt really a hashcat problem, its to do with X and the catalyst driver; however ubuntu forums tend to lean towards the gaming side of things, which isnt what i want. No disrespect meant!
So, has anyone else attempted to do what im doing?
I want to use my onboard VGA adapter to power X (normal ubuntu stuff) and the Radeon for hashcat only, like I did with bumblebee/optirun and my old nvidia card.
Any help would be greatly appreciated, its been about 16 hours since my old laptop ....dissapeared and im now really tired and need a little guidance.
P.S - Keep up the good work with hashcat, it's so much better than john ;-)
Good night!
T
First off, and as this is my first post, thanks for Hashcat - what a tool! I work in infosec and use it pretty much, on every pentest.
Now, up until 8am this morning, I had a different laptop running a Nvidia GT 650 card and used optirun to run hashcat, worked fine. Then that laptop dissapeared.......long story!
Anyway, I now have a different laptop, a dell vostro with an AMD Radeon 7600 series - can i get hashcat working,,,,no!
The furthest ive got is this error:
mac [ ~/Tools/oclHashcat-plus-0.14 ]$ ./oclHashcat-plus64.bin -m 2500 /tmp/WPACAPTURE-01.CAP.HCCAP ~/Tools/Wordlists/rockyou.txt
ERROR: clGetDeviceIDs() -1
Now, I had a similar error to that before and it was due to a kernel not being found in the hashcat path, so i downloaded a new 7zip, from http://hashcat.net/files/oclHashcat-plus-0.14.7z and extracted with 7zip x oclHashcat-plus-0.14.7z, to make sure all kernels were there and in the correct path.....No dice!
So some output:
mac [ ~/Tools/oclHashcat-plus-0.14 ]$ clinfo
Number of platforms: 1
Platform Profile: FULL_PROFILE
Platform Version: OpenCL 1.2 AMD-APP (1084.2)
Platform Name: AMD Accelerated Parallel Processing
Platform Vendor: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
Platform Extensions: cl_khr_icd cl_amd_event_callback cl_amd_offline_devices
Platform Name: AMD Accelerated Parallel Processing
Number of devices: 1
Device Type: CL_DEVICE_TYPE_CPU
Device ID: 4098
Board name:
Max compute units: 4
Max work items dimensions: 3
Max work items[0]: 1024
Max work items[1]: 1024
Max work items[2]: 1024
Max work group size: 1024
Preferred vector width char: 16
Preferred vector width short: 8
Preferred vector width int: 4
Preferred vector width long: 2
Preferred vector width float: 8
Preferred vector width double: 4
Native vector width char: 16
Native vector width short: 8
Native vector width int: 4
Native vector width long: 2
Native vector width float: 8
Native vector width double: 4
Max clock frequency: 2501Mhz
Address bits: 64
Max memory allocation: 2147483648
Image support: Yes
Max number of images read arguments: 128
Max number of images write arguments: 8
Max image 2D width: 8192
Max image 2D height: 8192
Max image 3D width: 2048
Max image 3D height: 2048
Max image 3D depth: 2048
Max samplers within kernel: 16
Max size of kernel argument: 4096
Alignment (bits) of base address: 1024
Minimum alignment (bytes) for any datatype: 128
Single precision floating point capability
Denorms: Yes
Quiet NaNs: Yes
Round to nearest even: Yes
Round to zero: Yes
Round to +ve and infinity: Yes
IEEE754-2008 fused multiply-add: Yes
Cache type: Read/Write
Cache line size: 64
Cache size: 32768
Global memory size: 8243982336
Constant buffer size: 65536
Max number of constant args: 8
Local memory type: Global
Local memory size: 32768
Kernel Preferred work group size multiple: 1
Error correction support: 0
Unified memory for Host and Device: 1
Profiling timer resolution: 1
Device endianess: Little
Available: Yes
Compiler available: Yes
Execution capabilities:
Execute OpenCL kernels: Yes
Execute native function: Yes
Queue properties:
Out-of-Order: No
Profiling : Yes
Platform ID: 0x00007f0f3a411e00
Name: Intel® Core i5-3210M CPU @ 2.50GHz
Vendor: GenuineIntel
Device OpenCL C version: OpenCL C 1.2
Driver version: 1084.2 (sse2,avx)
Profile: FULL_PROFILE
Version: OpenCL 1.2 AMD-APP (1084.2)
Extensions: cl_khr_fp64 cl_amd_fp64 cl_khr_global_int32_base_atomics cl_khr_global_int32_extended_atomics cl_khr_local_int32_base_atomics cl_khr_local_int32_extended_atomics cl_khr_int64_base_atomics cl_khr_int64_extended_atomics cl_khr_3d_image_writes cl_khr_byte_addressable_store cl_khr_gl_sharing cl_ext_device_fission cl_amd_device_attribute_query cl_amd_vec3 cl_amd_printf cl_amd_media_ops cl_amd_popcnt
mac [ ~/Tools/oclHashcat-plus-0.14 ]$ dpkg-query --list | grep fglrx*
ii fglrx-amdcccle-experimental-9 2:9.010-0ubuntu0.3 Catalyst Control Center for the AMD graphics accelerators
ii fglrx-experimental-9 2:9.010-0ubuntu0.3 Experimental AMD binary Xorg driver and kernel module
mac [ ~/Tools/oclHashcat-plus-0.14 ]$ lspci | grep "VGA"
00:02.0 VGA compatible controller: Intel Corporation Ivy Bridge Graphics Controller (rev 09)
01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] nee ATI Thames XT/GL [Radeon HD 7600M Series]
mac [ ~/Tools/oclHashcat-plus-0.14 ]$ fglrxinfo
X Error of failed request: BadRequest (invalid request code or no such operation)
Major opcode of failed request: 154 (GLX)
Minor opcode of failed request: 19 (X_GLXQueryServerString)
Serial number of failed request: 12
Current serial number in output stream: 12
Now, this is the second attempt at getting this working. The first time, I went to amd and downloaded the catalyst driver and unpacked, chmod'd and executed. The gui popped up and i clicked on through. I then restarted ubuntu, as prompted, and ended up with a low graphics environment and basically borked the system. I managed to revert back to my previous xorg.conf, following the gui instructions; but it totally screwed up unity and I could barely get a shell to fix things. It left the whole laptop a bit unstable, so I reinstalled and with the output above, this is where I am now.
This time, ive installed the restricted driver from Ubuntu System Settings > Additional Drivers - i suspect this is what the problem is, but don't have the time to rebuild this laptop again, if the catalys install borks everything again.
I know this isnt really a hashcat problem, its to do with X and the catalyst driver; however ubuntu forums tend to lean towards the gaming side of things, which isnt what i want. No disrespect meant!
So, has anyone else attempted to do what im doing?
I want to use my onboard VGA adapter to power X (normal ubuntu stuff) and the Radeon for hashcat only, like I did with bumblebee/optirun and my old nvidia card.
Any help would be greatly appreciated, its been about 16 hours since my old laptop ....dissapeared and im now really tired and need a little guidance.
P.S - Keep up the good work with hashcat, it's so much better than john ;-)
Good night!
T
↧
Rules with combinator attack
It it possible to use rules with the combinator attack? From what I can tell it allows the input, but it doesn't actually compute any rules based on the dictionaries.
With two (the same) dictionaries and rules applied.
Progress.......: 29/49 (59.18%) <- I would expect this number to be much higher.
With one dictionary and rules applied.
Progress.......: 21987/21987 (100.00%)
I am using the same rules and dictionaries in both examples. I realize it could add a lot of time by applying rules to a combinator attack, but am wondering if it is possible.
With two (the same) dictionaries and rules applied.
Progress.......: 29/49 (59.18%) <- I would expect this number to be much higher.
With one dictionary and rules applied.
Progress.......: 21987/21987 (100.00%)
I am using the same rules and dictionaries in both examples. I realize it could add a lot of time by applying rules to a combinator attack, but am wondering if it is possible.
↧
↧
scrypt support
Does anyone know if there has been any discussion about support for the scrypt aglo?
↧
oclHashcat-plus64 (0.14) and HD5850 -- No Error Message
Hello,
I'm trying to use oclHashcat-plus64 (version 0.14) with Catalyst 13.1 Drivers and AMD APP SDK v2.8
When I run the following command, I receive no errors it just sits there with the flashing hyphen
I had older drivers installed previously, so I uninstalled those, rebooted, then used Driver Fusion to remove the rest of the files. I installed the 13.1 Catalyst Suite and received an installation note that the SDK run time did not install and Hashcat was throwing errors.
So I went to the AMD site and installed AMD-APP-SDK-v2.8-Windows-64.exe then restarted.
Now I'm not receiving any errors but the program is doing nothing. I'm guessing it's something to do with my AMD installation and the SDK not installing natively, but I'm not entirely sure how to fix that. I'll keep searching but if there are any recommendations I'd appreciate them.
Thanks.
I'm trying to use oclHashcat-plus64 (version 0.14) with Catalyst 13.1 Drivers and AMD APP SDK v2.8
When I run the following command, I receive no errors it just sits there with the flashing hyphen
Code:
oclHashcat-plus64.exe -m 2500 a.hccap dic.lstI had older drivers installed previously, so I uninstalled those, rebooted, then used Driver Fusion to remove the rest of the files. I installed the 13.1 Catalyst Suite and received an installation note that the SDK run time did not install and Hashcat was throwing errors.
Code:
<package>
<description>AMD APP SDK Runtime</description>
<result>Fail</result>
<version>10.0.1084.4</version>
<size>90 </size>
</package>So I went to the AMD site and installed AMD-APP-SDK-v2.8-Windows-64.exe then restarted.
Now I'm not receiving any errors but the program is doing nothing. I'm guessing it's something to do with my AMD installation and the SDK not installing natively, but I'm not entirely sure how to fix that. I'll keep searching but if there are any recommendations I'd appreciate them.
Thanks.
↧
GTX Titan Support
Hi, it seems that the GTX Titan is not supported yet.
Am I wrong ? If no, do you know if an update will be available soon ?
Thanks.
Am I wrong ? If no, do you know if an update will be available soon ?
Thanks.
↧
Why is WPA/WPA2 maxlength limited to 15?
Is there a technical or implementation reason behind this limitation in hashcat?
↧
↧
hashcat doesn't support Snefru-256 hash?
Hey,
I have a Snefru-256 hash type to crack but hashcat does not support this hash.
I have a Snefru-256 hash type to crack but hashcat does not support this hash.
↧
ATI HD 7790 is not suppoerted.
Hello,
Since my last post regarding this subject is deleted, I find appropriate to open new one.
In fact: oclhashcat is not supporting ATI 7790 card.
Please discuss in this thread if you have different information.
System Win7 64bit, driver 13.4 (must use this one, in 13.1 7790 is not supported)
C:\oclHashcat-lite-0.15>oclHashcat-lite32.exe 5dXXX02abc4b2a76bXXX9d9110XXX592
oclHashcat-lite v0.15 by atom starting...
Password lengths: 1 - 54
Watchdog: Temperature abort trigger set to 90c
Watchdog: Temperature retain trigger set to 80c
Device #1: Bonaire, 1024MB, 1200Mhz, 14MCU
Device #2: Bonaire, 1024MB, 1200Mhz, 14MCU
Device #3: Bonaire, 1024MB, 1200Mhz, 14MCU
Device #4: Bonaire, 1024MB, 1200Mhz, 14MCU
STOP! Unsupported or bad installed GPU driver version detected!
You need -exactly- Catalyst v13.1 for very good reasons
You can use --force to override this but do not post error reports if you do so
Since my last post regarding this subject is deleted, I find appropriate to open new one.
In fact: oclhashcat is not supporting ATI 7790 card.
Please discuss in this thread if you have different information.
System Win7 64bit, driver 13.4 (must use this one, in 13.1 7790 is not supported)
C:\oclHashcat-lite-0.15>oclHashcat-lite32.exe 5dXXX02abc4b2a76bXXX9d9110XXX592
oclHashcat-lite v0.15 by atom starting...
Password lengths: 1 - 54
Watchdog: Temperature abort trigger set to 90c
Watchdog: Temperature retain trigger set to 80c
Device #1: Bonaire, 1024MB, 1200Mhz, 14MCU
Device #2: Bonaire, 1024MB, 1200Mhz, 14MCU
Device #3: Bonaire, 1024MB, 1200Mhz, 14MCU
Device #4: Bonaire, 1024MB, 1200Mhz, 14MCU
STOP! Unsupported or bad installed GPU driver version detected!
You need -exactly- Catalyst v13.1 for very good reasons
You can use --force to override this but do not post error reports if you do so
↧
openfire hash
This hashes from openfire (jabber-server), make by me from admin console
passwd:admin
bfdebe31af3af230f38c6cdc8c436287d5ef3b64ba2f4787
passwd:123456
ee912d51ff70ddd3dbf295d37876f14e7f73ecd0b6dd1076
and also have hashes in two times long, also from openfire
in docs of openfire mention SHA-1 and Blowfish alogitm
which algoritm is use?
neither brute software not recognise this
hashcat can brute this?
which crackware can brute this?
passwd:admin
bfdebe31af3af230f38c6cdc8c436287d5ef3b64ba2f4787
passwd:123456
ee912d51ff70ddd3dbf295d37876f14e7f73ecd0b6dd1076
and also have hashes in two times long, also from openfire
in docs of openfire mention SHA-1 and Blowfish alogitm
which algoritm is use?
neither brute software not recognise this
hashcat can brute this?
which crackware can brute this?
↧
oracle11g -a6 -a7 increment not work
key -i ignore
hc.exe -m 112 -a6 -i orahash dic ?d?d?d?d?d
hc.exe -m 112 -a6 -i orahash dic ?d?d?d?d?d
↧
↧
Is 2xAMD GPU on SLI motherboard able to work?
Below are using oclHashcat-plus.
1) Having a SLI motherboard, just wondering whether 2x AMD HD5870 able to work at the same time?
2) Without activating crossfire mode, I simply plug in 1x 4850 and 1x 5870, is this combination able to work?
3) To have oclHashcat-plus work properly in dual card, is SLI or Crossfire must activate or simply 2 identical card without SLI or Xfire still able to work?
Sorry if you find above questions are stupid but I just want to find out before invest money on system that turn out to be useless.
Thanks
1) Having a SLI motherboard, just wondering whether 2x AMD HD5870 able to work at the same time?
2) Without activating crossfire mode, I simply plug in 1x 4850 and 1x 5870, is this combination able to work?
3) To have oclHashcat-plus work properly in dual card, is SLI or Crossfire must activate or simply 2 identical card without SLI or Xfire still able to work?
Sorry if you find above questions are stupid but I just want to find out before invest money on system that turn out to be useless.
Thanks
↧
Haswell bench
First bench in bruteforce -a 3 -m 0 gives about 96-100M on my 4770k @4,4GHz.
I do more benchmarks tomorrow.
I do more benchmarks tomorrow.
↧
Noob here, need help understanding what went wrong
Hi!
I'm new to Hashcat. I'm using the Hashcat GUI because I'm not too familiar with hashcat itself, and I just want to see how long it would actually take to crack a single MD5 hash from a cisco config here. It's one that I actually made, and I already know the password, which is "cisco", which is the equivalent of $sdf$6978yhg$jnb76sd
I'm trying to get the cracker running properly but I can not for the life of me figure out what I'm doing wrong. The error that I'm always getting after hashcat starts running is
Skipping line: $sdf$6978yhg$jnb76sd (line length exception)
..now, I've checked the forums and made sure that the cracker is pointing to my text file with my hash above, and am using a dictionary file with the password in it, but no matter how I config hashcat, it always gives me this error above. I'm using the config of "md5crypt, MD5(Unix), Freebsd MD5, Cisco IOS MD5" which seems ideal since I'm dealing with a Cisco hash.
I'm not really sure how to make this work, but maybe the hash generated by my cisco device is shorter than what hashcat can work with? I've checked and double checked the text file and there are no trailing space before or after my hash. I'm pretty stumped and would appreciate some help?
I'm new to Hashcat. I'm using the Hashcat GUI because I'm not too familiar with hashcat itself, and I just want to see how long it would actually take to crack a single MD5 hash from a cisco config here. It's one that I actually made, and I already know the password, which is "cisco", which is the equivalent of $sdf$6978yhg$jnb76sd
I'm trying to get the cracker running properly but I can not for the life of me figure out what I'm doing wrong. The error that I'm always getting after hashcat starts running is
Skipping line: $sdf$6978yhg$jnb76sd (line length exception)
..now, I've checked the forums and made sure that the cracker is pointing to my text file with my hash above, and am using a dictionary file with the password in it, but no matter how I config hashcat, it always gives me this error above. I'm using the config of "md5crypt, MD5(Unix), Freebsd MD5, Cisco IOS MD5" which seems ideal since I'm dealing with a Cisco hash.
I'm not really sure how to make this work, but maybe the hash generated by my cisco device is shorter than what hashcat can work with? I've checked and double checked the text file and there are no trailing space before or after my hash. I'm pretty stumped and would appreciate some help?
↧