hi im replacing all the specs on my pc and am wondering if the MSI Radeon RX 6600 XT 8 GB MECH 2X OC Video Card would preform well with hash cat and if its worth getting if not what would your recommend
↧
MSI Radeon RX 6600 XT 8 GB MECH 2X OC Video Card good for hashcat?
↧
ASUS TUF GAMING FX505DT-BQ051T AMD Ryzen 5 8GB RAM 512GB SSD 15.6 for hashcat?
hi im thinking of getting the ASUS TUF GAMING FX505DT-BQ051T AMD Ryzen 5 8GB RAM 512GB SSD 15.6 Laptop do you guys think this laptop would work well with hashcat?
↧
↧
Problems with combinate (-a 1) attack mode.
Hello everyone! I have confused with hashcat speed of this attack mode.
Look. I created my own script for generating passwords. Everything working fine, password successfully restored. But I have problems with speed, which magically decrease in 1000x. Depence on which side dict is.
Full command: hashcat -a 1 -m 26600 -d 1 -w 4 $metamask$hash credentials.txt rules/main.dict. (and hashcat -a 1 -m 26600 -d 1 -w 4 $metamask$hash rules/main.dict credentials.txt also).
So yes, I found that this mode only connect right side, not both. So I decided to mix dictionaries manually. Look at the difference in speed:
null
null
So the questions:
1) Why this is happens?
2) Am I miss any flag that can ask hashcat to combinate "/rules/main.dict" in start and end?
3) If there is no solution to combinate in start and end of password and I forced to run hashcat two times, can I fix this difference in speed?
Thank you very much for your knowledge and your time!
left side.png (Size: 212.6 KB / Downloads: 6)
right side.png (Size: 91.98 KB / Downloads: 8)
Look. I created my own script for generating passwords. Everything working fine, password successfully restored. But I have problems with speed, which magically decrease in 1000x. Depence on which side dict is.
Full command: hashcat -a 1 -m 26600 -d 1 -w 4 $metamask$hash credentials.txt rules/main.dict. (and hashcat -a 1 -m 26600 -d 1 -w 4 $metamask$hash rules/main.dict credentials.txt also).
So yes, I found that this mode only connect right side, not both. So I decided to mix dictionaries manually. Look at the difference in speed:
null
null
So the questions:
1) Why this is happens?
2) Am I miss any flag that can ask hashcat to combinate "/rules/main.dict" in start and end?
3) If there is no solution to combinate in start and end of password and I forced to run hashcat two times, can I fix this difference in speed?
Thank you very much for your knowledge and your time!
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/beba8/beba88b5e6fb3edff280ac6ae7805964fd2d77ee" alt="PNG Image .png"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/beba8/beba88b5e6fb3edff280ac6ae7805964fd2d77ee" alt="PNG Image .png"
↧
Hashcat and OpenCL installation issue xeon E5-4640
Hi,
I am trying to get a DL380 Gen 8 with 4 x E5-4640 0 @ 2.40GHz working with hashcat under Linux 20.04LTS.
I have successfully installed “Intel® CPU Runtime for OpenCL™ Applications 18.1 for Linux* OS (64bit only)” and it sees my Intel CPUs but "clinfo" hangs when I run it. Also, when I try and run hashcat I receive an "clCreateContext(): CL_DEVICE_NOT_AVAILABLE " and also Device #1 "skipped"?
Any ideas what is wrong/missing?
thanks
ubuntu@ubuntu:~/hashcat/hashcat-6.2.4$ hashcat -I
hashcat (v5.1.0) starting...
OpenCL Info:
Platform ID #1
Vendor : Intel(R) Corporation
Name : Intel(R) CPU Runtime for OpenCL(TM) Applications
Version : OpenCL 2.1 LINUX
Device ID #1
Type : CPU
Vendor ID : 8
Vendor : Intel(R) Corporation
Name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-4640 0 @ 2.40GHz
Version : OpenCL 2.1 (Build 0)
Processor(s) : 64
Clock : 2400
Memory : 16089/64359 MB allocatable
OpenCL Version : OpenCL C 2.0
Driver Version : 18.1.0.0920
ubuntu@ubuntu:~/hashcat/hashcat-6.2.4$ ./hashcat.bin -m 0 -t 32 -a 7 --opencl-device-type 1 example0.hash ?a?a?a?a | more
hashcat (v6.2.4) starting
clCreateContext(): CL_DEVICE_NOT_AVAILABLE
OpenCL API (OpenCL 2.1 LINUX) - Platform #1 [Intel(R) Corporation]
==================================================================
* Device #1: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-4640 0 @ 2.40GHz, skipped
Minimum password length supported by kernel: 0
Maximum password length supported by kernel: 256
clinfo:
Number of platforms 1
Platform Name Intel(R) CPU Runtime for OpenCL(TM) Applications Platform Vendor Intel(R) Corporation Platform Version OpenCL 2.1 LINUX Platform Profile FULL_PROFILE Platform Extensions cl_khr_icd cl_khr_global_int32_base_atomics cl_khr_global_int32_extended_atomics cl_khr_local_int32_base_atomics cl_khr_local_int32_extended_atomics cl_khr_byte_addressable_store cl_khr_depth_images cl_khr_3d_image_writes cl_intel_exec_by_local_thread cl_khr_spir cl_khr_fp64 cl_khr_image2d_from_buffer cl_intel_vec_len_hint
Platform Host timer resolution 1ns
Platform Extensions function suffix INTEL
Platform Name Intel(R) CPU Runtime for OpenCL(TM) Applications
Number of devices 1 Device Name Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-4640 0 @ 2.40GHz
Device Vendor Intel(R) Corporation Device Vendor ID 0x8086 Device Version OpenCL 2.1 (Build 0) Driver Version 18.1.0.0920
Device OpenCL C Version OpenCL C 2.0
Device Type CPU
Device Profile FULL_PROFILE
Device Available Yes
Compiler Available Yes
Linker Available Yes
Max compute units 64
Max clock frequency 2400MHz
Device Partition (core)
Max number of sub-devices 64
Supported partition types by counts, equally, by names (Intel)
Supported affinity domains (n/a)
Max work item dimensions 3
Max work item sizes 8192x8192x8192
Max work group size 8192
Preferred work group size multiple <getWGsizes:1171: create context : error -2>
Max sub-groups per work group 1
Preferred / native vector sizes
char 1 / 16
short 1 / 8
int 1 / 4
long 1 / 2
half 0 / 0 (n/a)
float 1 / 8
double 1 / 4 (cl_khr_fp64)
Half-precision Floating-point support (n/a)
Single-precision Floating-point support (core)
Denormals Yes
Infinity and NANs Yes
Round to nearest Yes
Round to zero No
Round to infinity No
IEEE754-2008 fused multiply-add No
Support is emulated in software No
Correctly-rounded divide and sqrt operations No
Double-precision Floating-point support (cl_khr_fp64)
Denormals Yes
Infinity and NANs Yes
Round to nearest Yes
Round to zero Yes
Round to infinity Yes
IEEE754-2008 fused multiply-add Yes
Support is emulated in software No
Address bits 64, Little-Endian
Global memory size 67485503488 (62.85GiB)
Error Correction support No
Max memory allocation 16871375872 (15.71GiB)
Unified memory for Host and Device Yes
Shared Virtual Memory (SVM) capabilities (core)
Coarse-grained buffer sharing Yes
Fine-grained buffer sharing Yes
Fine-grained system sharing Yes
Atomics Yes
Minimum alignment for any data type 128 bytes
Alignment of base address 1024 bits (128 bytes)
Preferred alignment for atomics
SVM 64 bytes
Global 64 bytes
Local 0 bytes
Max size for global variable 65536 (64KiB)
Preferred total size of global vars 65536 (64KiB)
Global Memory cache type Read/Write
Global Memory cache size 262144 (256KiB)
Global Memory cache line size 64 bytes
Image support Yes
Max number of samplers per kernel 480
Max size for 1D images from buffer 1054460992 pixels
Max 1D or 2D image array size 2048 images
Base address alignment for 2D image buffers 64 bytes
Pitch alignment for 2D image buffers 64 pixels
Max 2D image size 16384x16384 pixels
Max 3D image size 2048x2048x2048 pixels
Max number of read image args 480
Max number of write image args 480
Max number of read/write image args 480
Max number of pipe args 16
Max active pipe reservations 4095
Max pipe packet size 1024
Global Memory cache type Read/Write
Global Memory cache size 262144 (256KiB)
Global Memory cache line size 64 bytes
Image support Yes
Max number of samplers per kernel 480
Max size for 1D images from buffer 1054460992 pixels
Max 1D or 2D image array size 2048 images
Base address alignment for 2D image buffers 64 bytes
Pitch alignment for 2D image buffers 64 pixels
Max 2D image size 16384x16384 pixels
Max 3D image size 2048x2048x2048 pixels
Max number of read image args 480
Max number of write image args 480
Max number of read/write image args 480
Max number of pipe args 16
Max active pipe reservations 4095
Max pipe packet size 1024
Local memory type Global
Local memory size 32768 (32KiB)
Max number of constant args 480
Max constant buffer size 131072 (128KiB)
Max size of kernel argument 3840 (3.75KiB)
Queue properties (on host)
Out-of-order execution Yes
Profiling Yes
Local thread execution (Intel) Yes
Queue properties (on device)
Out-of-order execution Yes
Profiling Yes
Preferred size 4294967295 (4GiB)
Max size 4294967295 (4GiB)
Max queues on device 4294967295
Max events on device 4294967295
Prefer user sync for interop No
Profiling timer resolution 1ns
Execution capabilities
Run OpenCL kernels Yes
Run native kernels Yes
Sub-group independent forward progress No
IL version SPIR-V_1.0
SPIR versions 1.2
printf() buffer size 1048576 (1024KiB)
Built-in kernels (n/a)
Device Extensions cl_khr_icd cl_khr_global_int32_base_atomics cl_khr_global_int32_extended_atomics cl_khr_local_int32_base_atomics cl_khr_local_int32_extended_atomics cl_khr_byte_addressable_store cl_khr_depth_images cl_khr_3d_image_writes cl_intel_exec_by_local_thread cl_khr_spir cl_khr_fp64 cl_khr_image2d_from_buffer cl_intel_vec_len_hint
<<<**** HANGS HERE *****>>>
I am trying to get a DL380 Gen 8 with 4 x E5-4640 0 @ 2.40GHz working with hashcat under Linux 20.04LTS.
I have successfully installed “Intel® CPU Runtime for OpenCL™ Applications 18.1 for Linux* OS (64bit only)” and it sees my Intel CPUs but "clinfo" hangs when I run it. Also, when I try and run hashcat I receive an "clCreateContext(): CL_DEVICE_NOT_AVAILABLE " and also Device #1 "skipped"?
Any ideas what is wrong/missing?
thanks
ubuntu@ubuntu:~/hashcat/hashcat-6.2.4$ hashcat -I
hashcat (v5.1.0) starting...
OpenCL Info:
Platform ID #1
Vendor : Intel(R) Corporation
Name : Intel(R) CPU Runtime for OpenCL(TM) Applications
Version : OpenCL 2.1 LINUX
Device ID #1
Type : CPU
Vendor ID : 8
Vendor : Intel(R) Corporation
Name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-4640 0 @ 2.40GHz
Version : OpenCL 2.1 (Build 0)
Processor(s) : 64
Clock : 2400
Memory : 16089/64359 MB allocatable
OpenCL Version : OpenCL C 2.0
Driver Version : 18.1.0.0920
ubuntu@ubuntu:~/hashcat/hashcat-6.2.4$ ./hashcat.bin -m 0 -t 32 -a 7 --opencl-device-type 1 example0.hash ?a?a?a?a | more
hashcat (v6.2.4) starting
clCreateContext(): CL_DEVICE_NOT_AVAILABLE
OpenCL API (OpenCL 2.1 LINUX) - Platform #1 [Intel(R) Corporation]
==================================================================
* Device #1: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-4640 0 @ 2.40GHz, skipped
Minimum password length supported by kernel: 0
Maximum password length supported by kernel: 256
clinfo:
Number of platforms 1
Platform Name Intel(R) CPU Runtime for OpenCL(TM) Applications Platform Vendor Intel(R) Corporation Platform Version OpenCL 2.1 LINUX Platform Profile FULL_PROFILE Platform Extensions cl_khr_icd cl_khr_global_int32_base_atomics cl_khr_global_int32_extended_atomics cl_khr_local_int32_base_atomics cl_khr_local_int32_extended_atomics cl_khr_byte_addressable_store cl_khr_depth_images cl_khr_3d_image_writes cl_intel_exec_by_local_thread cl_khr_spir cl_khr_fp64 cl_khr_image2d_from_buffer cl_intel_vec_len_hint
Platform Host timer resolution 1ns
Platform Extensions function suffix INTEL
Platform Name Intel(R) CPU Runtime for OpenCL(TM) Applications
Number of devices 1 Device Name Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-4640 0 @ 2.40GHz
Device Vendor Intel(R) Corporation Device Vendor ID 0x8086 Device Version OpenCL 2.1 (Build 0) Driver Version 18.1.0.0920
Device OpenCL C Version OpenCL C 2.0
Device Type CPU
Device Profile FULL_PROFILE
Device Available Yes
Compiler Available Yes
Linker Available Yes
Max compute units 64
Max clock frequency 2400MHz
Device Partition (core)
Max number of sub-devices 64
Supported partition types by counts, equally, by names (Intel)
Supported affinity domains (n/a)
Max work item dimensions 3
Max work item sizes 8192x8192x8192
Max work group size 8192
Preferred work group size multiple <getWGsizes:1171: create context : error -2>
Max sub-groups per work group 1
Preferred / native vector sizes
char 1 / 16
short 1 / 8
int 1 / 4
long 1 / 2
half 0 / 0 (n/a)
float 1 / 8
double 1 / 4 (cl_khr_fp64)
Half-precision Floating-point support (n/a)
Single-precision Floating-point support (core)
Denormals Yes
Infinity and NANs Yes
Round to nearest Yes
Round to zero No
Round to infinity No
IEEE754-2008 fused multiply-add No
Support is emulated in software No
Correctly-rounded divide and sqrt operations No
Double-precision Floating-point support (cl_khr_fp64)
Denormals Yes
Infinity and NANs Yes
Round to nearest Yes
Round to zero Yes
Round to infinity Yes
IEEE754-2008 fused multiply-add Yes
Support is emulated in software No
Address bits 64, Little-Endian
Global memory size 67485503488 (62.85GiB)
Error Correction support No
Max memory allocation 16871375872 (15.71GiB)
Unified memory for Host and Device Yes
Shared Virtual Memory (SVM) capabilities (core)
Coarse-grained buffer sharing Yes
Fine-grained buffer sharing Yes
Fine-grained system sharing Yes
Atomics Yes
Minimum alignment for any data type 128 bytes
Alignment of base address 1024 bits (128 bytes)
Preferred alignment for atomics
SVM 64 bytes
Global 64 bytes
Local 0 bytes
Max size for global variable 65536 (64KiB)
Preferred total size of global vars 65536 (64KiB)
Global Memory cache type Read/Write
Global Memory cache size 262144 (256KiB)
Global Memory cache line size 64 bytes
Image support Yes
Max number of samplers per kernel 480
Max size for 1D images from buffer 1054460992 pixels
Max 1D or 2D image array size 2048 images
Base address alignment for 2D image buffers 64 bytes
Pitch alignment for 2D image buffers 64 pixels
Max 2D image size 16384x16384 pixels
Max 3D image size 2048x2048x2048 pixels
Max number of read image args 480
Max number of write image args 480
Max number of read/write image args 480
Max number of pipe args 16
Max active pipe reservations 4095
Max pipe packet size 1024
Global Memory cache type Read/Write
Global Memory cache size 262144 (256KiB)
Global Memory cache line size 64 bytes
Image support Yes
Max number of samplers per kernel 480
Max size for 1D images from buffer 1054460992 pixels
Max 1D or 2D image array size 2048 images
Base address alignment for 2D image buffers 64 bytes
Pitch alignment for 2D image buffers 64 pixels
Max 2D image size 16384x16384 pixels
Max 3D image size 2048x2048x2048 pixels
Max number of read image args 480
Max number of write image args 480
Max number of read/write image args 480
Max number of pipe args 16
Max active pipe reservations 4095
Max pipe packet size 1024
Local memory type Global
Local memory size 32768 (32KiB)
Max number of constant args 480
Max constant buffer size 131072 (128KiB)
Max size of kernel argument 3840 (3.75KiB)
Queue properties (on host)
Out-of-order execution Yes
Profiling Yes
Local thread execution (Intel) Yes
Queue properties (on device)
Out-of-order execution Yes
Profiling Yes
Preferred size 4294967295 (4GiB)
Max size 4294967295 (4GiB)
Max queues on device 4294967295
Max events on device 4294967295
Prefer user sync for interop No
Profiling timer resolution 1ns
Execution capabilities
Run OpenCL kernels Yes
Run native kernels Yes
Sub-group independent forward progress No
IL version SPIR-V_1.0
SPIR versions 1.2
printf() buffer size 1048576 (1024KiB)
Built-in kernels (n/a)
Device Extensions cl_khr_icd cl_khr_global_int32_base_atomics cl_khr_global_int32_extended_atomics cl_khr_local_int32_base_atomics cl_khr_local_int32_extended_atomics cl_khr_byte_addressable_store cl_khr_depth_images cl_khr_3d_image_writes cl_intel_exec_by_local_thread cl_khr_spir cl_khr_fp64 cl_khr_image2d_from_buffer cl_intel_vec_len_hint
<<<**** HANGS HERE *****>>>
↧
What's the answer to "what is the current stable version of hashcat"?
Hi!
"What is the current stable version of hashcat?"
According to Hashcat announcements forum it's 6.2.0:
https://hashcat.net/forum/forum-16.html
According to Hashcat Wikipedia article it's 6.2.4:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hashcat
According to Hashcat download page it's 6.2.5:
https://hashcat.net/hashcat/
This question comes up when signing up for an account on these forums. What am I supposed to type in as the answer?
I tried "6.2.5", "6.2.4" and I just tried "6.2.0". I even tried "v6.2.5", "hashcat v6.2.5" as it's typed out on the download page, and I even went as far as pasting in MD5 hash values of these strings. None of which worked.
If you can't share this secret publicly, can someone send me a PM with the correct answer to the question? Alternatively, can you tell me if the full version number is expected, and if it contains any letters?
Playfully yours,
meow
🐈
"What is the current stable version of hashcat?"
According to Hashcat announcements forum it's 6.2.0:
https://hashcat.net/forum/forum-16.html
According to Hashcat Wikipedia article it's 6.2.4:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hashcat
According to Hashcat download page it's 6.2.5:
https://hashcat.net/hashcat/
This question comes up when signing up for an account on these forums. What am I supposed to type in as the answer?
I tried "6.2.5", "6.2.4" and I just tried "6.2.0". I even tried "v6.2.5", "hashcat v6.2.5" as it's typed out on the download page, and I even went as far as pasting in MD5 hash values of these strings. None of which worked.
If you can't share this secret publicly, can someone send me a PM with the correct answer to the question? Alternatively, can you tell me if the full version number is expected, and if it contains any letters?
Playfully yours,
meow
🐈
↧
↧
Is GTX 560 Ti no longer supported by Hashcat?
Hi!
Forum rules say:
"Do not post issues about using a GPU that is no longer supported by the latest driver from its vendor."
https://hashcat.net/forum/announcement-2.html
So I would like to start off by establishing if GTX 560 Ti is supported or not by the current version of Hashcat.
By "vendor" you mean Nvidia, right?
I have this GPU:
https://www.asus.com/SupportOnly/ENGTX56..._Download/
Latest driver available there is version 306.23 from Oct 25, 2012.
I looked at the Nvida driver download page I find newer drivers:
https://www.nvidia.com/en-us/geforce/drivers/
They have version 391.35 from Mar 27, 2018.
That's still 3 years too old for Hashcat to support it?
I also wonder if it's possible that the same GPU is still supported on Linux based OSes if the vendor is not Nvidia and is still maintained? I am running Windows on it.
I also looked at the "Is your card supported" sticky thread:
https://hashcat.net/forum/thread-919.html
Following the link for Nvidia reveals a list where GTX 560 is listed as having "Compute Capability" of version "2.0". What does that tell me? It has CUDA cores?... I know it has CUDA cores, 384 of them, not many by today's measure but it still does have them.
"Is your card supported"... in what sense? This question is ill-defined. Yes, GTX 560 Ti does have CUDA support if that's what you're after, but the real question is if it's supported by Hashcat! None of those links lead to answers of such questions.
I didn't look closer at the GitHub link for AMD GPUs as it seems to be programming related rather than displaying what AMD GPUs are compatible with Hashcat, and in that sense, it's the same as the Nvidia link displaying what Nvidia GPUs are CUDA compatible. That sticky alone is as old as GTX 560 itself, I don't see how that's helpful at all (someone please fill me in), other than showing you if your GPU got CUDAs, in hope that Hashcat of the time had support for your model so you could leverage good hash(-ish) performance.
Do you have a list of your own that clearly indicates what GPU cards are supported by Hashcat? A compatibility chart with Hashcat version numbers would be very helpful.
I could go on and download an old version of Hashcat to see if that works better with my GPU. It's just that there are so many versions, it would be helpful to be able to narrow it down a little, and the issue may not be related to GPU drivers anyway (the rule is presuming that the issue is related to outdated driver). So for that reason I am reluctant to go down this rabbit hole, it's not that I am lazy. But thanks to this clearly defined rule, I have hit a road block before I had the chance to tell you what the problem is that I'm having with this GPU. So it seems I won't be able to ask for help with Hashcat on Hashcat forums, not until I upgrade my GPU to something more recent, in which case I may not need your help at all.
Playfully yours,
meow
🐈
Forum rules say:
"Do not post issues about using a GPU that is no longer supported by the latest driver from its vendor."
https://hashcat.net/forum/announcement-2.html
So I would like to start off by establishing if GTX 560 Ti is supported or not by the current version of Hashcat.
By "vendor" you mean Nvidia, right?
I have this GPU:
https://www.asus.com/SupportOnly/ENGTX56..._Download/
Latest driver available there is version 306.23 from Oct 25, 2012.
I looked at the Nvida driver download page I find newer drivers:
https://www.nvidia.com/en-us/geforce/drivers/
They have version 391.35 from Mar 27, 2018.
That's still 3 years too old for Hashcat to support it?
I also wonder if it's possible that the same GPU is still supported on Linux based OSes if the vendor is not Nvidia and is still maintained? I am running Windows on it.
I also looked at the "Is your card supported" sticky thread:
https://hashcat.net/forum/thread-919.html
Following the link for Nvidia reveals a list where GTX 560 is listed as having "Compute Capability" of version "2.0". What does that tell me? It has CUDA cores?... I know it has CUDA cores, 384 of them, not many by today's measure but it still does have them.
"Is your card supported"... in what sense? This question is ill-defined. Yes, GTX 560 Ti does have CUDA support if that's what you're after, but the real question is if it's supported by Hashcat! None of those links lead to answers of such questions.
I didn't look closer at the GitHub link for AMD GPUs as it seems to be programming related rather than displaying what AMD GPUs are compatible with Hashcat, and in that sense, it's the same as the Nvidia link displaying what Nvidia GPUs are CUDA compatible. That sticky alone is as old as GTX 560 itself, I don't see how that's helpful at all (someone please fill me in), other than showing you if your GPU got CUDAs, in hope that Hashcat of the time had support for your model so you could leverage good hash(-ish) performance.
Do you have a list of your own that clearly indicates what GPU cards are supported by Hashcat? A compatibility chart with Hashcat version numbers would be very helpful.
I could go on and download an old version of Hashcat to see if that works better with my GPU. It's just that there are so many versions, it would be helpful to be able to narrow it down a little, and the issue may not be related to GPU drivers anyway (the rule is presuming that the issue is related to outdated driver). So for that reason I am reluctant to go down this rabbit hole, it's not that I am lazy. But thanks to this clearly defined rule, I have hit a road block before I had the chance to tell you what the problem is that I'm having with this GPU. So it seems I won't be able to ask for help with Hashcat on Hashcat forums, not until I upgrade my GPU to something more recent, in which case I may not need your help at all.
Playfully yours,
meow
🐈
↧
bruteforcing this data
hi, guys i am new here
i forgot my password but i have an idea of my password so bitgo gave me some data and say i must try to bruite force the pass now i am stuck with the data i got from bitgo since i dont know which one to use so please anyone who can help how i can excecute this into hashcat please help i will give example of the data below.
here you go: {
"iv":"qdsZZWoUK/WKmcPLzrBUhg==",
"v":1,
"iter":10000,
"ks":256,
"ts":64,
"mode":"ccm",
"adata":"",
"cipher":"aes",
"salt":"j4VpR8Rqag0=",
"ct":"z12cqlIJ8UjZMTrr9Sne9eGHkmC7VG8tcdOTTND+PJFL2DDCKAw5+tuv0Oc7e6mB//ee6cFbPed7KAl5fH6mQeLaJi6uChEcfNwOOMsGJn1mhxM0+yT7R4POGilQxapEZsi7vdG6lkjX4dOk81M4okAeRJ6hxbjA="
}
i forgot my password but i have an idea of my password so bitgo gave me some data and say i must try to bruite force the pass now i am stuck with the data i got from bitgo since i dont know which one to use so please anyone who can help how i can excecute this into hashcat please help i will give example of the data below.
here you go: {
"iv":"qdsZZWoUK/WKmcPLzrBUhg==",
"v":1,
"iter":10000,
"ks":256,
"ts":64,
"mode":"ccm",
"adata":"",
"cipher":"aes",
"salt":"j4VpR8Rqag0=",
"ct":"z12cqlIJ8UjZMTrr9Sne9eGHkmC7VG8tcdOTTND+PJFL2DDCKAw5+tuv0Oc7e6mB//ee6cFbPed7KAl5fH6mQeLaJi6uChEcfNwOOMsGJn1mhxM0+yT7R4POGilQxapEZsi7vdG6lkjX4dOk81M4okAeRJ6hxbjA="
}
↧
I have three issues hopefully easy ones and I'm out of options.
I've been trying to figure this out for hours the definite issue is I'm getting, "Time out is not disabled". I understand it needs the patch but I can't figure out how to do it at least not in a way I feel safe trying so if someone could explain that to me step by step or send me a link I would be very grateful.
I'm not going to bother wasting your time with all the specs because they are in the field in the screenshots except for I'm using an AMD 3700X CPU and Windows 11.
My old rig had a 2070Super and was running in MH/s the 3070 is running KH/s I can't figure out the reason for any of these issues. With the 2070 Super I installed Cuda and I was golden but this one has the problem I mentioned and I'm getting:
Optimized kernel requested but not available or not required. Falling back to pure kernel
I don't have any idea if that's good or bad. The last thing Hashcat is seeing my GPU as two and I only have one. If I use -d 1 it runs but with very little memory. If I run -d 2 it says, "Please be patient" and never does anything.
PS C:\Users\jacki>PS C:\hashcat-6.2.5> .\hashcat -m 22000 wlan13.16800 H:\Wordlists -a 0 -w 4 -O
hashcat (v6.2.5) starting
* Device #1: WARNING! Kernel exec timeout is not disabled.
This may cause "CL_OUT_OF_RESOURCES" or related errors.
To disable the timeout, see: https://hashcat.net/q/timeoutpatch
* Device #2: WARNING! Kernel exec timeout is not disabled.
This may cause "CL_OUT_OF_RESOURCES" or related errors.
To disable the timeout, see: https://hashcat.net/q/timeoutpatch
CUDA API (CUDA 11.5)
====================
* Device #1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070, 7132/8191 MB, 46MCU
OpenCL API (OpenCL 3.0 CUDA 11.5.121) - Platform #1 [NVIDIA Corporation]
========================================================================
* Device #2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070, skipped
Kernel ./OpenCL/m22000-optimized.cl:
Optimized kernel requested, but not available or not required
Falling back to pure kernel
Minimum password length supported by kernel: 8
Maximum password length supported by kernel: 63
Hashes: 8 digests; 8 unique digests, 5 unique salts
Bitmaps: 16 bits, 65536 entries, 0x0000ffff mask, 262144 bytes, 5/13 rotates
Rules: 1
Optimizers applied:
* Zero-Byte
* Slow-Hash-SIMD-LOOP
Watchdog: Temperature abort trigger set to 90c
INFO: Removed 2 hashes found as potfile entries or as empty hashes.
Host memory required for this attack: 1464 MB
Dictionary cache hit:
* Filename..: H:\Wordlists/1.txt
* Passwords.: 14344385
* Bytes.....: 139921511
* Keyspace..: 14344385
[s]tatus [p]ause ypass [c]heckpoint [f]inish [q]uit =>
Session..........: hashcat
Status...........: Running
Hash.Mode........: 22000 (WPA-PBKDF2-PMKID+EAPOL)
Hash.Target......: wlan13.16800
Time.Started.....: Wed Dec 08 09:01:33 2021 (34 secs)
Time.Estimated...: Wed Dec 08 09:02:46 2021 (39 secs)
Kernel.Feature...: Pure Kernel
Guess.Base.......: File (H:\Wordlists/1.txt)
Guess.Queue......: 1/7 (14.29%)
Speed.#1.........: 643.8 kH/s (279.87ms) @ Accel:64 Loops:512 Thr:512 Vec:1
Recovered........: 2/8 (25.00%) Digests, 1/5 (20.00%) Salts
Progress.........: 39499878/71721925 (55.07%)
Rejected.........: 15382630/39499878 (38.94%)
Restore.Point....: 7005347/14344385 (48.84%)
Restore.Sub.#1...: Salt:2 Amplifier:0-1 Iteration:0-1
Candidate.Engine.: Device Generator
Candidates.#1....: jillian13! -> chowderstick
Hardware.Mon.#1..: Temp: 61c Fan: 67% Util:100% Core:1979MHz Mem:6993MHz Bus:16
Approaching final keyspace - workload adjusted.
I tried doing what it says but then it wont use the driver that I install as per Hashcat forum all I can find is the newest and Hashcat says that 7.5 isn't supported use 7.4. I had this problem last night but I rolled everything back and I thought it was fixed but as you can see it's not. If I run it with -d 2 it says be patient and doesn't do anything -d 1 or not using -d it fails.
For the temperature I put the fan on 100% and it holds steady at 53, but I keep getting the temperature warning. When I get it I was hitting S immediately to see the temp. Then I opened the GPU monitor just in case and it's not showing anything near 65 so I'm not sure what's going on there. It will throw the warning up four or more times one after the other real fast then it stops until I start another session.
Session..........: hashcat
Status...........: Exhausted
Hash.Mode........: 22000 (WPA-PBKDF2-PMKID+EAPOL)
Hash.Target......: wlan13.16800
Time.Started.....: Wed Dec 08 09:01:33 2021 (1 min, 2 secs)
Time.Estimated...: Wed Dec 08 09:02:35 2021 (0 secs)
Kernel.Feature...: Pure Kernel
Guess.Base.......: File (H:\Wordlists/1.txt)
Guess.Queue......: 1/7 (14.29%)
Speed.#1.........: 637.1 kH/s (169.67ms) @ Accel:64 Loops:512 Thr:512 Vec:1
Recovered........: 2/8 (25.00%) Digests, 1/5 (20.00%) Salts
Progress.........: 71721925/71721925 (100.00%)
Rejected.........: 23674565/71721925 (33.01%)
Restore.Point....: 14344385/14344385 (100.00%)
Restore.Sub.#1...: Salt:4 Amplifier:0-1 Iteration:0-1
Candidate.Engine.: Device Generator
Candidates.#1....: $HEX[303136363032323533] -> $HEX[042a0337c2a156616d6f732103]
Hardware.Mon.#1..: Temp: 58c Fan: 68% Util: 79% Core:1979MHz Mem:6994MHz Bus:16
Dictionary cache hit:
* Filename..: H:\Wordlists/realhuman_phill.txt
* Passwords.: 63941069
* Bytes.....: 716441107
* Keyspace..: 63941069
Cracking performance lower than expected?
* Append -S to the commandline.
This has a drastic speed impact but can be better for specific attacks.
Typical scenarios are a small wordlist but a large ruleset.
* Update your backend API runtime / driver the right way:
https://hashcat.net/faq/wrongdriver
* Create more work items to make use of your parallelization power:
https://hashcat.net/faq/morework
Approaching final keyspace - workload adjusted.
Session..........: hashcat
Status...........: Exhausted
Hash.Mode........: 22000 (WPA-PBKDF2-PMKID+EAPOL)
Hash.Target......: wlan13.16800
Time.Started.....: Wed Dec 08 09:02:41 2021 (5 mins, 3 secs)
Time.Estimated...: Wed Dec 08 09:07:44 2021 (0 secs)
Kernel.Feature...: Pure Kernel
Guess.Base.......: File (H:\Wordlists/realhuman_phill.txt)
Guess.Queue......: 2/7 (28.57%)
Speed.#1.........: 619.0 kH/s (247.58ms) @ Accel:32 Loops:1024 Thr:512 Vec:1
Recovered........: 2/8 (25.00%) Digests, 1/5 (20.00%) Salts
Progress.........: 319705345/319705345 (100.00%)
Rejected.........: 85910445/319705345 (26.87%)
Restore.Point....: 63941069/63941069 (100.00%)
Restore.Sub.#1...: Salt:4 Amplifier:0-1 Iteration:0-1
Candidate.Engine.: Device Generator
Candidates.#1....: $HEX[7a7469757772737963] -> $HEX[b47461656b776f6e646f]
Hardware.Mon.#1..: Temp: 61c Fan: 70% Util: 56% Core:1979MHz Mem:6994MHz Bus:16
Dictionary cache hit:
* Filename..: H:\Wordlists/realuniq.lst
* Passwords.: 1212336035
* Bytes.....: 15696118781
* Keyspace..: 1212336035
Driver temperature threshold met on GPU #1. Expect reduced performance.
Driver temperature threshold met on GPU #1. Expect reduced performance.
Driver temperature threshold met on GPU #1. Expect reduced performance.
Driver temperature threshold met on GPU #1. Expect reduced performance.
Driver temperature threshold met on GPU #1. Expect reduced performance.
[s]tatus [p]ause ypass [c]heckpoint [f]inish [q]uit =>
Session..........: hashcat
Status...........: Running
Hash.Mode........: 22000 (WPA-PBKDF2-PMKID+EAPOL)
Hash.Target......: wlan13.16800
Time.Started.....: Wed Dec 08 09:07:51 2021 (6 mins, 2 secs)
Time.Estimated...: Wed Dec 08 11:18:10 2021 (2 hours, 4 mins)
Kernel.Feature...: Pure Kernel
Guess.Base.......: File (H:\Wordlists/realuniq.lst)
Guess.Queue......: 3/7 (42.86%)
Speed.#1.........: 616.6 kH/s (281.68ms) @ Accel:32 Loops:1024 Thr:512 Vec:1
Recovered........: 2/8 (25.00%) Digests, 1/5 (20.00%) Salts
Progress.........: 313908465/6061680175 (5.18%)
Rejected.........: 35052785/313908465 (11.17%)
Restore.Point....: 62781693/1212336035 (5.18%)
Restore.Sub.#1...: Salt:4 Amplifier:0-1 Iteration:0-1
Candidate.Engine.: Device Generator
Candidates.#1....: 25630550 -> 2605131894
Hardware.Mon.#1..: Temp: 62c Fan: 71% Util:100% Core:1979MHz Mem:6994MHz Bus:16
Driver temperature threshold met on GPU #1. Expect reduced performance.
[s]tatus [p]ause ypass [c]heckpoint [f]inish [q]uit =>
Session..........: hashcat
Status...........: Running
Hash.Mode........: 22000 (WPA-PBKDF2-PMKID+EAPOL)
Hash.Target......: wlan13.16800
Time.Started.....: Wed Dec 08 09:07:51 2021 (7 mins, 7 secs)
Time.Estimated...: Wed Dec 08 11:18:00 2021 (2 hours, 3 mins)
Kernel.Feature...: Pure Kernel
Guess.Base.......: File (H:\Wordlists/realuniq.lst)
Guess.Queue......: 3/7 (42.86%)
Speed.#1.........: 616.9 kH/s (282.51ms) @ Accel:32 Loops:1024 Thr:512 Vec:1
Recovered........: 2/8 (25.00%) Digests, 1/5 (20.00%) Salts
Progress.........: 368905085/6061680175 (6.09%)
Rejected.........: 41061245/368905085 (11.13%)
Restore.Point....: 73737952/1212336035 (6.08%)
Restore.Sub.#1...: Salt:1 Amplifier:0-1 Iteration:2-5
Candidate.Engine.: Device Generator
Candidates.#1....: 2ilovewendy2 -> 2LUSCIOUS
Hardware.Mon.#1..: Temp: 62c Fan: 70% Util:100% Core:1979MHz Mem:6994MHz Bus:16
[s]tatus [p]ause ypass [c]heckpoint [f]inish [q]uit =>
I'm not going to bother wasting your time with all the specs because they are in the field in the screenshots except for I'm using an AMD 3700X CPU and Windows 11.
My old rig had a 2070Super and was running in MH/s the 3070 is running KH/s I can't figure out the reason for any of these issues. With the 2070 Super I installed Cuda and I was golden but this one has the problem I mentioned and I'm getting:
Optimized kernel requested but not available or not required. Falling back to pure kernel
I don't have any idea if that's good or bad. The last thing Hashcat is seeing my GPU as two and I only have one. If I use -d 1 it runs but with very little memory. If I run -d 2 it says, "Please be patient" and never does anything.
PS C:\Users\jacki>PS C:\hashcat-6.2.5> .\hashcat -m 22000 wlan13.16800 H:\Wordlists -a 0 -w 4 -O
hashcat (v6.2.5) starting
* Device #1: WARNING! Kernel exec timeout is not disabled.
This may cause "CL_OUT_OF_RESOURCES" or related errors.
To disable the timeout, see: https://hashcat.net/q/timeoutpatch
* Device #2: WARNING! Kernel exec timeout is not disabled.
This may cause "CL_OUT_OF_RESOURCES" or related errors.
To disable the timeout, see: https://hashcat.net/q/timeoutpatch
CUDA API (CUDA 11.5)
====================
* Device #1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070, 7132/8191 MB, 46MCU
OpenCL API (OpenCL 3.0 CUDA 11.5.121) - Platform #1 [NVIDIA Corporation]
========================================================================
* Device #2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070, skipped
Kernel ./OpenCL/m22000-optimized.cl:
Optimized kernel requested, but not available or not required
Falling back to pure kernel
Minimum password length supported by kernel: 8
Maximum password length supported by kernel: 63
Hashes: 8 digests; 8 unique digests, 5 unique salts
Bitmaps: 16 bits, 65536 entries, 0x0000ffff mask, 262144 bytes, 5/13 rotates
Rules: 1
Optimizers applied:
* Zero-Byte
* Slow-Hash-SIMD-LOOP
Watchdog: Temperature abort trigger set to 90c
INFO: Removed 2 hashes found as potfile entries or as empty hashes.
Host memory required for this attack: 1464 MB
Dictionary cache hit:
* Filename..: H:\Wordlists/1.txt
* Passwords.: 14344385
* Bytes.....: 139921511
* Keyspace..: 14344385
[s]tatus [p]ause ypass [c]heckpoint [f]inish [q]uit =>
Session..........: hashcat
Status...........: Running
Hash.Mode........: 22000 (WPA-PBKDF2-PMKID+EAPOL)
Hash.Target......: wlan13.16800
Time.Started.....: Wed Dec 08 09:01:33 2021 (34 secs)
Time.Estimated...: Wed Dec 08 09:02:46 2021 (39 secs)
Kernel.Feature...: Pure Kernel
Guess.Base.......: File (H:\Wordlists/1.txt)
Guess.Queue......: 1/7 (14.29%)
Speed.#1.........: 643.8 kH/s (279.87ms) @ Accel:64 Loops:512 Thr:512 Vec:1
Recovered........: 2/8 (25.00%) Digests, 1/5 (20.00%) Salts
Progress.........: 39499878/71721925 (55.07%)
Rejected.........: 15382630/39499878 (38.94%)
Restore.Point....: 7005347/14344385 (48.84%)
Restore.Sub.#1...: Salt:2 Amplifier:0-1 Iteration:0-1
Candidate.Engine.: Device Generator
Candidates.#1....: jillian13! -> chowderstick
Hardware.Mon.#1..: Temp: 61c Fan: 67% Util:100% Core:1979MHz Mem:6993MHz Bus:16
Approaching final keyspace - workload adjusted.
I tried doing what it says but then it wont use the driver that I install as per Hashcat forum all I can find is the newest and Hashcat says that 7.5 isn't supported use 7.4. I had this problem last night but I rolled everything back and I thought it was fixed but as you can see it's not. If I run it with -d 2 it says be patient and doesn't do anything -d 1 or not using -d it fails.
For the temperature I put the fan on 100% and it holds steady at 53, but I keep getting the temperature warning. When I get it I was hitting S immediately to see the temp. Then I opened the GPU monitor just in case and it's not showing anything near 65 so I'm not sure what's going on there. It will throw the warning up four or more times one after the other real fast then it stops until I start another session.
Session..........: hashcat
Status...........: Exhausted
Hash.Mode........: 22000 (WPA-PBKDF2-PMKID+EAPOL)
Hash.Target......: wlan13.16800
Time.Started.....: Wed Dec 08 09:01:33 2021 (1 min, 2 secs)
Time.Estimated...: Wed Dec 08 09:02:35 2021 (0 secs)
Kernel.Feature...: Pure Kernel
Guess.Base.......: File (H:\Wordlists/1.txt)
Guess.Queue......: 1/7 (14.29%)
Speed.#1.........: 637.1 kH/s (169.67ms) @ Accel:64 Loops:512 Thr:512 Vec:1
Recovered........: 2/8 (25.00%) Digests, 1/5 (20.00%) Salts
Progress.........: 71721925/71721925 (100.00%)
Rejected.........: 23674565/71721925 (33.01%)
Restore.Point....: 14344385/14344385 (100.00%)
Restore.Sub.#1...: Salt:4 Amplifier:0-1 Iteration:0-1
Candidate.Engine.: Device Generator
Candidates.#1....: $HEX[303136363032323533] -> $HEX[042a0337c2a156616d6f732103]
Hardware.Mon.#1..: Temp: 58c Fan: 68% Util: 79% Core:1979MHz Mem:6994MHz Bus:16
Dictionary cache hit:
* Filename..: H:\Wordlists/realhuman_phill.txt
* Passwords.: 63941069
* Bytes.....: 716441107
* Keyspace..: 63941069
Cracking performance lower than expected?
* Append -S to the commandline.
This has a drastic speed impact but can be better for specific attacks.
Typical scenarios are a small wordlist but a large ruleset.
* Update your backend API runtime / driver the right way:
https://hashcat.net/faq/wrongdriver
* Create more work items to make use of your parallelization power:
https://hashcat.net/faq/morework
Approaching final keyspace - workload adjusted.
Session..........: hashcat
Status...........: Exhausted
Hash.Mode........: 22000 (WPA-PBKDF2-PMKID+EAPOL)
Hash.Target......: wlan13.16800
Time.Started.....: Wed Dec 08 09:02:41 2021 (5 mins, 3 secs)
Time.Estimated...: Wed Dec 08 09:07:44 2021 (0 secs)
Kernel.Feature...: Pure Kernel
Guess.Base.......: File (H:\Wordlists/realhuman_phill.txt)
Guess.Queue......: 2/7 (28.57%)
Speed.#1.........: 619.0 kH/s (247.58ms) @ Accel:32 Loops:1024 Thr:512 Vec:1
Recovered........: 2/8 (25.00%) Digests, 1/5 (20.00%) Salts
Progress.........: 319705345/319705345 (100.00%)
Rejected.........: 85910445/319705345 (26.87%)
Restore.Point....: 63941069/63941069 (100.00%)
Restore.Sub.#1...: Salt:4 Amplifier:0-1 Iteration:0-1
Candidate.Engine.: Device Generator
Candidates.#1....: $HEX[7a7469757772737963] -> $HEX[b47461656b776f6e646f]
Hardware.Mon.#1..: Temp: 61c Fan: 70% Util: 56% Core:1979MHz Mem:6994MHz Bus:16
Dictionary cache hit:
* Filename..: H:\Wordlists/realuniq.lst
* Passwords.: 1212336035
* Bytes.....: 15696118781
* Keyspace..: 1212336035
Driver temperature threshold met on GPU #1. Expect reduced performance.
Driver temperature threshold met on GPU #1. Expect reduced performance.
Driver temperature threshold met on GPU #1. Expect reduced performance.
Driver temperature threshold met on GPU #1. Expect reduced performance.
Driver temperature threshold met on GPU #1. Expect reduced performance.
[s]tatus [p]ause ypass [c]heckpoint [f]inish [q]uit =>
Session..........: hashcat
Status...........: Running
Hash.Mode........: 22000 (WPA-PBKDF2-PMKID+EAPOL)
Hash.Target......: wlan13.16800
Time.Started.....: Wed Dec 08 09:07:51 2021 (6 mins, 2 secs)
Time.Estimated...: Wed Dec 08 11:18:10 2021 (2 hours, 4 mins)
Kernel.Feature...: Pure Kernel
Guess.Base.......: File (H:\Wordlists/realuniq.lst)
Guess.Queue......: 3/7 (42.86%)
Speed.#1.........: 616.6 kH/s (281.68ms) @ Accel:32 Loops:1024 Thr:512 Vec:1
Recovered........: 2/8 (25.00%) Digests, 1/5 (20.00%) Salts
Progress.........: 313908465/6061680175 (5.18%)
Rejected.........: 35052785/313908465 (11.17%)
Restore.Point....: 62781693/1212336035 (5.18%)
Restore.Sub.#1...: Salt:4 Amplifier:0-1 Iteration:0-1
Candidate.Engine.: Device Generator
Candidates.#1....: 25630550 -> 2605131894
Hardware.Mon.#1..: Temp: 62c Fan: 71% Util:100% Core:1979MHz Mem:6994MHz Bus:16
Driver temperature threshold met on GPU #1. Expect reduced performance.
[s]tatus [p]ause ypass [c]heckpoint [f]inish [q]uit =>
Session..........: hashcat
Status...........: Running
Hash.Mode........: 22000 (WPA-PBKDF2-PMKID+EAPOL)
Hash.Target......: wlan13.16800
Time.Started.....: Wed Dec 08 09:07:51 2021 (7 mins, 7 secs)
Time.Estimated...: Wed Dec 08 11:18:00 2021 (2 hours, 3 mins)
Kernel.Feature...: Pure Kernel
Guess.Base.......: File (H:\Wordlists/realuniq.lst)
Guess.Queue......: 3/7 (42.86%)
Speed.#1.........: 616.9 kH/s (282.51ms) @ Accel:32 Loops:1024 Thr:512 Vec:1
Recovered........: 2/8 (25.00%) Digests, 1/5 (20.00%) Salts
Progress.........: 368905085/6061680175 (6.09%)
Rejected.........: 41061245/368905085 (11.13%)
Restore.Point....: 73737952/1212336035 (6.08%)
Restore.Sub.#1...: Salt:1 Amplifier:0-1 Iteration:2-5
Candidate.Engine.: Device Generator
Candidates.#1....: 2ilovewendy2 -> 2LUSCIOUS
Hardware.Mon.#1..: Temp: 62c Fan: 70% Util:100% Core:1979MHz Mem:6994MHz Bus:16
[s]tatus [p]ause ypass [c]heckpoint [f]inish [q]uit =>
↧
Is it possible to save in a file not matched hashes?
Hello. I wonder if it possible to save in a file all hashes that don't fit to our password we are looking for? Just in a format like potfiles (hash:plain password) ?
↧
↧
1x Asus EKWB Geforce RTX 3090 24GB vs 4x ROG Strix GeForce GTX 1080Ti 11GB OC
Hi guys.
I want ask about compare Hashcat performance between
this
Asus EKWB Geforce RTX 3090 24GB (RTX3090-24-EK)
vs
my 4xROG Strix GeForce GTX 1080 Ti OC edition 11GB
both with waterblock.
Sorry for my english
Pls tell me, can I change this new rtx3090 with my 4x gtx1080Ti?
I want ask about compare Hashcat performance between
this
Asus EKWB Geforce RTX 3090 24GB (RTX3090-24-EK)
vs
my 4xROG Strix GeForce GTX 1080 Ti OC edition 11GB
both with waterblock.
Sorry for my english
Pls tell me, can I change this new rtx3090 with my 4x gtx1080Ti?
↧
Unknown excel password encoding
Hello, I've got hex encoded password for 2007 excel .xlsx file (using 9400 rule). When I'm converting hex string to ascii one of symbols look like that: ê. Excel throw invalid password error. I'm using excel 2016 to open file. UTF codecs can't convert hex to text because of start byte error. My question: Is that possible to open excel with hex string? I really can't find information about it. If not possible, what you can recommend for my situation?
↧
Extract 1password hash from iPhone
Good afternoon, I am writing here for the first time.
Have a question about extracting the 1password master password hash.
The situation is this: I only used 1password on my old iPhone 10 and didn’t use it on Mac / PC. I forgot my master password as I last used this iPhone in 2019.
I have access to the iPhone and iCloud, the information I need is in 1password, the secret key is entered, only the master password is needed.
Tell me how can I extract the 1password hash from the iPhone for further decryption? Thanks to all!
Have a question about extracting the 1password master password hash.
The situation is this: I only used 1password on my old iPhone 10 and didn’t use it on Mac / PC. I forgot my master password as I last used this iPhone in 2019.
I have access to the iPhone and iCloud, the information I need is in 1password, the secret key is entered, only the master password is needed.
Tell me how can I extract the 1password hash from the iPhone for further decryption? Thanks to all!
↧
Low hashrate with GTX 1650 when using CUDA
Hi!
So I finally did it, I robbed a bank and I purchased a brand new GPU for use with Hashcat. It's not a monster RTX model, but a modest GTX 1650. It's good enough for me, and it's much better than the GTX 560 Ti I was struggling with for the last two days.
You would think that buying a new GPU with up to date drivers will make your problems go away. Not in my case they didn't. I was still unable to run Hashcat 6.2.5.
I think I was being patient enough. I waited for 10 minutes before I aborted.
Before trying to run 6.2.5, I was running 3.0 with flying colors. I was getting up to 6500 MH/s, relying only on Open CL, no CUDA runtime. This is a huge improvement for my limited resources. An MD5 job that took 1 hour, 23 minutes and 29 seconds on GTX 560 Ti was now taking only 12 minutes and 22 seconds on GTX 1650. Compare that with 31 minutes 16 seconds on Radeon HD 6870, and 3 hour, 39 minutes and 15 seconds on Intel UHD 630. As you can see this is a big win for me.
I decided to start with 3.0 because I was having great success with that version using old GPUs. Then I moved on to 4.0 version and my hashrate started to decline, quite significantly. I was getting 470 MH/s at most. With version 5.0 I saw a good improvement, maxing it out at 1835 MH/s.
But version 6.2.5 was still beyond my reach. It doesn't work with GTX 560 Ti at all and it almost works with GTX 1650. For some reason it was failing to load and 6.2.5 requires CUDA 11. So I downloaded and installed CUDA 11, but on top of CUDA 8. These can be installed side by side, right? I restarted the command shell and restarted Hashcat 6.25 and it worked. But with one noticeable difference, it was running at half the speed I was getting with Open CL. It is currently at work and hashing at about 3700 MH/s.
Maybe I am missing something, but isn't CUDA mode supposed to be faster than Open CL on Nvidia GPUs? That's the whole point of installing it, I presume.
Again, this is an MD5 job and it should be plow through it in mere minutes. I am using brute force mode, with a mask. I am also specifying an output file for convenience. That's it, no other options are enabled, just -a, -m, -o, hash file, and a mask.
Can someone explain to me the significance of these three info segments? Why is CUDA listed twice? How is "OpenCL 3.0 CUDA 11.5.121" CUDA different from "CUDA 11.5" CUDA? And why is the AMD CPU being skipped? Is it because it lacks iGPU? Can it still be put to work?
If Open CL API can be used to utilize CUDA, why do I have to install CUDA SDK toolkit? If Open CL is the fallback runtime like it says in the warning message, why does it not do what it says and fall back to using Open CL API for Open CL runtime rather than stalling when waiting for CUDA runtime to load? Logically, if CUDA runtime is not installed, or the wrong version is installed, the program should respond in some way or time out rather than just sitting there waiting for better times.
Please forgive me for the many questions, I don't mean to bother you, you probably have better things to do than to answer my silly noob questions. But I would greatly appreciate it if you found time to write me a line or two. At least to say hello.
Playfully yours,
meow
🐈
So I finally did it, I robbed a bank and I purchased a brand new GPU for use with Hashcat. It's not a monster RTX model, but a modest GTX 1650. It's good enough for me, and it's much better than the GTX 560 Ti I was struggling with for the last two days.
You would think that buying a new GPU with up to date drivers will make your problems go away. Not in my case they didn't. I was still unable to run Hashcat 6.2.5.
Code:
hashcat (v6.2.5) starting
Successfully initialized NVIDIA CUDA library.
Failed to initialize NVIDIA RTC library.
* Device #1: CUDA SDK Toolkit not installed or incorrectly installed.
CUDA SDK Toolkit required for proper device support and utilization.
Falling back to OpenCL runtime.
* Device #1: WARNING! Kernel exec timeout is not disabled.
This may cause "CL_OUT_OF_RESOURCES" or related errors.
To disable the timeout, see: https://hashcat.net/q/timeoutpatch
OpenCL API (OpenCL 3.0 CUDA 11.5.121) - Platform #1 [NVIDIA Corporation]
========================================================================
* Device #1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650, 3520/4095 MB (1023 MB allocatable), 14MCU
OpenCL API (OpenCL 2.0 AMD-APP (1800.11)) - Platform #2 [Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.]
======================================================================================
* Device #2: , skipped
Minimum password length supported by kernel: 0
Maximum password length supported by kernel: 256
Hashes: 7 digests; 7 unique digests, 1 unique salts
Bitmaps: 16 bits, 65536 entries, 0x0000ffff mask, 262144 bytes, 5/13 rotates
Optimizers applied:
* Zero-Byte
* Early-Skip
* Not-Salted
* Not-Iterated
* Single-Salt
* Brute-Force
* Raw-Hash
ATTENTION! Pure (unoptimized) backend kernels selected.
Pure kernels can crack longer passwords, but drastically reduce performance.
If you want to switch to optimized kernels, append -O to your commandline.
See the above message to find out about the exact limits.
Watchdog: Temperature abort trigger set to 90c
Initializing backend runtime for device #1. Please be patient...
I think I was being patient enough. I waited for 10 minutes before I aborted.
Before trying to run 6.2.5, I was running 3.0 with flying colors. I was getting up to 6500 MH/s, relying only on Open CL, no CUDA runtime. This is a huge improvement for my limited resources. An MD5 job that took 1 hour, 23 minutes and 29 seconds on GTX 560 Ti was now taking only 12 minutes and 22 seconds on GTX 1650. Compare that with 31 minutes 16 seconds on Radeon HD 6870, and 3 hour, 39 minutes and 15 seconds on Intel UHD 630. As you can see this is a big win for me.
I decided to start with 3.0 because I was having great success with that version using old GPUs. Then I moved on to 4.0 version and my hashrate started to decline, quite significantly. I was getting 470 MH/s at most. With version 5.0 I saw a good improvement, maxing it out at 1835 MH/s.
But version 6.2.5 was still beyond my reach. It doesn't work with GTX 560 Ti at all and it almost works with GTX 1650. For some reason it was failing to load and 6.2.5 requires CUDA 11. So I downloaded and installed CUDA 11, but on top of CUDA 8. These can be installed side by side, right? I restarted the command shell and restarted Hashcat 6.25 and it worked. But with one noticeable difference, it was running at half the speed I was getting with Open CL. It is currently at work and hashing at about 3700 MH/s.
Maybe I am missing something, but isn't CUDA mode supposed to be faster than Open CL on Nvidia GPUs? That's the whole point of installing it, I presume.
Again, this is an MD5 job and it should be plow through it in mere minutes. I am using brute force mode, with a mask. I am also specifying an output file for convenience. That's it, no other options are enabled, just -a, -m, -o, hash file, and a mask.
Code:
CUDA API (CUDA 11.5)
====================
* Device #1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650, 3327/4095 MB, 14MCU
OpenCL API (OpenCL 3.0 CUDA 11.5.121) - Platform #1 [NVIDIA Corporation]
========================================================================
* Device #2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650, skipped
OpenCL API (OpenCL 2.0 AMD-APP (1800.11)) - Platform #2 [Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.]
======================================================================================
* Device #3: , skipped
Can someone explain to me the significance of these three info segments? Why is CUDA listed twice? How is "OpenCL 3.0 CUDA 11.5.121" CUDA different from "CUDA 11.5" CUDA? And why is the AMD CPU being skipped? Is it because it lacks iGPU? Can it still be put to work?
If Open CL API can be used to utilize CUDA, why do I have to install CUDA SDK toolkit? If Open CL is the fallback runtime like it says in the warning message, why does it not do what it says and fall back to using Open CL API for Open CL runtime rather than stalling when waiting for CUDA runtime to load? Logically, if CUDA runtime is not installed, or the wrong version is installed, the program should respond in some way or time out rather than just sitting there waiting for better times.
Please forgive me for the many questions, I don't mean to bother you, you probably have better things to do than to answer my silly noob questions. But I would greatly appreciate it if you found time to write me a line or two. At least to say hello.
Playfully yours,
meow
🐈
↧
↧
Newbie - my try didn´t work for WPA
hy there - i´m newbie.
tried to hashcat a handshake with following comand line:
tried to bruteforce a 10 digit pw (alphanumeric) with the following comand:
hashcat.exe -m 22000 -a 3 ?u?d tiscali.hccapx ?1?1?1?1?1?1?1?1?1?1
(WPA is chaged from 2500 to 22000 - thay told me) but getting following error: Hash ´?u?d´: Separator unmatched >>> No hashes loaded was seaching the internet for a solution and also trying multile changes of comand line - dind´t find any progress
if i type it like:
hashcat.exe -m 22000 -a 3 -1?u?d tiscali.hccapx ?1?1?1?1?1?1?1?1?1?1 or
hashcat.exe -m 22000 -a 3 -1 ?u?d tiscali.hccapx ?1?1?1?1?1?1?1?1?1?1
it says: hashfile ... on line Separator unmatched
unknown.png (Size: 175.1 KB / Downloads: 1)
tried to hashcat a handshake with following comand line:
tried to bruteforce a 10 digit pw (alphanumeric) with the following comand:
hashcat.exe -m 22000 -a 3 ?u?d tiscali.hccapx ?1?1?1?1?1?1?1?1?1?1
(WPA is chaged from 2500 to 22000 - thay told me) but getting following error: Hash ´?u?d´: Separator unmatched >>> No hashes loaded was seaching the internet for a solution and also trying multile changes of comand line - dind´t find any progress
if i type it like:
hashcat.exe -m 22000 -a 3 -1?u?d tiscali.hccapx ?1?1?1?1?1?1?1?1?1?1 or
hashcat.exe -m 22000 -a 3 -1 ?u?d tiscali.hccapx ?1?1?1?1?1?1?1?1?1?1
it says: hashfile ... on line Separator unmatched
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/beba8/beba88b5e6fb3edff280ac6ae7805964fd2d77ee" alt="PNG Image .png"
↧
How do I combine Restore option with Optimized kernel option?
Hi!
I'm using Hashcat 6.2.5 and I can't seem to find a way to combine the Restore option (--restore) with the option to run with optimized kernel (-O) on the same command line. Is this not possible at all or am I missing something like having to specify the options in a particular order? I think I have exhausted all possibilities by now.
These are some of the combinations I have tried.
According to the usage hint, options are specified after the name of the program but before the hashfile. But according to the performance hint text that comes up if your hashrate is very low, the option for optimized kernel (-O) is to be "appended", meaning specified at the end of the line.
Note that I can use the -O as well as --restore, but not in combination it would seem.
Maybe I'm missing an argument somewhere?
Playfully yours,
meow
🐈
I'm using Hashcat 6.2.5 and I can't seem to find a way to combine the Restore option (--restore) with the option to run with optimized kernel (-O) on the same command line. Is this not possible at all or am I missing something like having to specify the options in a particular order? I think I have exhausted all possibilities by now.
Code:
hashcat -a3 -m0 hashfile.txt -O --restore
hashcat -a3 -m0 --restore hashfile.txt -O
hashcat -a3 -m0 --restore -O hashfile.txt
These are some of the combinations I have tried.
Code:
Usage: hashcat [options]... hash|hashfile|hccapxfile [dictionary|mask|directory]...
Try --help for more help.
According to the usage hint, options are specified after the name of the program but before the hashfile. But according to the performance hint text that comes up if your hashrate is very low, the option for optimized kernel (-O) is to be "appended", meaning specified at the end of the line.
Code:
ATTENTION! Pure (unoptimized) OpenCL kernels selected.
This enables cracking passwords and salts > length 32 but for the price of drastically reduced performance.
If you want to switch to optimized OpenCL kernels, append -O to your commandline.
Note that I can use the -O as well as --restore, but not in combination it would seem.
Maybe I'm missing an argument somewhere?
Playfully yours,
meow
🐈
↧
How do I combine Restore option with Optimized kernel option?
Hi!
I'm using Hashcat 6.2.5 and I can't seem to find a way to combine the Restore option (--restore) with the option to run with optimized kernel (-O) on the same command line. Is this not possible at all or am I missing something like having to specify the options in a particular order? I think I have exhausted all possibilities by now.
These are some of the combinations I have tried.
According to the usage hint, options are specified after the name of the program but before the hashfile. But according to the performance hint text that comes up if your hashrate is very low, the option for optimized kernel (-O) is to be "appended", meaning specified at the end of the line.
Note that I can use the -O as well as --restore, but not in combination it would seem.
Maybe I'm missing an argument somewhere?
Playfully yours,
meow
🐈
I'm using Hashcat 6.2.5 and I can't seem to find a way to combine the Restore option (--restore) with the option to run with optimized kernel (-O) on the same command line. Is this not possible at all or am I missing something like having to specify the options in a particular order? I think I have exhausted all possibilities by now.
Code:
hashcat -a3 -m0 hashfile.txt -O --restore
hashcat -a3 -m0 --restore hashfile.txt -O
hashcat -a3 -m0 --restore -O hashfile.txt
These are some of the combinations I have tried.
Code:
Usage: hashcat [options]... hash|hashfile|hccapxfile [dictionary|mask|directory]...
Try --help for more help.
According to the usage hint, options are specified after the name of the program but before the hashfile. But according to the performance hint text that comes up if your hashrate is very low, the option for optimized kernel (-O) is to be "appended", meaning specified at the end of the line.
Code:
ATTENTION! Pure (unoptimized) OpenCL kernels selected.
This enables cracking passwords and salts > length 32 but for the price of drastically reduced performance.
If you want to switch to optimized OpenCL kernels, append -O to your commandline.
Note that I can use the -O as well as --restore, but not in combination it would seem.
Maybe I'm missing an argument somewhere?
Playfully yours,
meow
🐈
↧
Number of newlines is increasing when editing forum posts
Hi!
Is it just me, or are you guys also having a problem with newlines when posting new posts or editing existing posts? The problem is that the more times I edit a post to make changes or to add additional bits of information, the number of new lines increases by one newline for each newline.
Initial post:
After editing the post once:
After editing the post twice:
It's quite a process to clean up all the goo between paragraphs. I click to edit in full editor, and then starting from the first line of the second paragraph, I use Shift and up arrow key to select upwards, ensuring I including the last line of the first paragraph to encompass all hidden characters, then whilst holding down Shift key, I press End key to deselect the good bit of the last line in first paragraph, and lastly I press Delete key to ensure I delete all characters to the right. Then I press Enter two times to get back to proper spacing between paragraphs, just one line worth of spacing.
Then after all that trouble, it all returns again if I edit the post once more, and this time the problem has grown on each newline by one additional newline, so it's growing. Sometimes, somehow, I manage to stop the spread and I don't know how or why, sometimes I'm just lucky I guess. It's like trying to contain a virus, and it just keeps on growing.
I thought you should know about it. I'm sorry if this is not the right place to post about it, or if I'm the only one having this issue. My OCD immediately kicks in when I see this sort of thing.
Is it just me, or are you guys also having a problem with newlines when posting new posts or editing existing posts? The problem is that the more times I edit a post to make changes or to add additional bits of information, the number of new lines increases by one newline for each newline.
Initial post:
Quote:Haxx0r ipsum headers d00dz vi infinite loop semaphore it's a feature ifdef ssh fatal strlen packet sniffer public foad bin. Data void var todo giga sql highjack cache bypass new blob injection ack baz function salt char script kiddies int class Donald Knuth. Wabbit wombat machine code rm -rf null echo *.* epoch.
Cat eof less endif injection infinite loop epoch suitably small values. Overflow crack tcp perl for headers *.* default wombat bytes giga wabbit syn worm. New packet gc ban foad fork thread socket chown over clock I'm sorry Dave, I'm afraid I can't do that ddos cache.
After editing the post once:
Quote:Haxx0r ipsum headers d00dz vi infinite loop semaphore it's a feature ifdef ssh fatal strlen packet sniffer public foad bin. Data void var todo giga sql highjack cache bypass new blob injection ack baz function salt char script kiddies int class Donald Knuth. Wabbit wombat machine code rm -rf null echo *.* epoch.
Cat eof less endif injection infinite loop epoch suitably small values. Overflow crack tcp perl for headers *.* default wombat bytes giga wabbit syn worm. New packet gc ban foad fork thread socket chown over clock I'm sorry Dave, I'm afraid I can't do that ddos cache.
After editing the post twice:
Quote:Haxx0r ipsum headers d00dz vi infinite loop semaphore it's a feature ifdef ssh fatal strlen packet sniffer public foad bin. Data void var todo giga sql highjack cache bypass new blob injection ack baz function salt char script kiddies int class Donald Knuth. Wabbit wombat machine code rm -rf null echo *.* epoch.
Cat eof less endif injection infinite loop epoch suitably small values. Overflow crack tcp perl for headers *.* default wombat bytes giga wabbit syn worm. New packet gc ban foad fork thread socket chown over clock I'm sorry Dave, I'm afraid I can't do that ddos cache.
It's quite a process to clean up all the goo between paragraphs. I click to edit in full editor, and then starting from the first line of the second paragraph, I use Shift and up arrow key to select upwards, ensuring I including the last line of the first paragraph to encompass all hidden characters, then whilst holding down Shift key, I press End key to deselect the good bit of the last line in first paragraph, and lastly I press Delete key to ensure I delete all characters to the right. Then I press Enter two times to get back to proper spacing between paragraphs, just one line worth of spacing.
Then after all that trouble, it all returns again if I edit the post once more, and this time the problem has grown on each newline by one additional newline, so it's growing. Sometimes, somehow, I manage to stop the spread and I don't know how or why, sometimes I'm just lucky I guess. It's like trying to contain a virus, and it just keeps on growing.
I thought you should know about it. I'm sorry if this is not the right place to post about it, or if I'm the only one having this issue. My OCD immediately kicks in when I see this sort of thing.
↧
↧
why Hashcat v6.2.5 is slower than v5.1.0
Hi, there! Is it normal? Was it expected? v6.2.5 is slower than v5.1.0
Not just slower, but about 200 times slower! Of course, with my specific hardware/software/hash.
I am new to Hashcat. I'm using Windows and a 10-year-old laptop with an Intel Celeron CPU and an Intel GPU.
This CPU is a 3rd generation Intel processor, codename IvyBridge.
https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/...pencl.html
I was not able to use hashcat on Linux so far. Every time I got an "illegal hardware instruction" error.
MACs are synthetic (not real), for educational purposes only. Details are here
v5.1.0 took about 5 seconds.
v6.2.5 took about 16 minutes.
Most of the time of those 16 minutes I see this message on the screen: Initializing backend runtime for device #1. Please be patient...
-D 1 means use CPU, works for both versions of Hashcat
-D 2 means use GPU, doesn't work in my case for both versions
v6.2.5 complains: Device #2: Not enough allocatable device memory for this attack.
v5.1.0 complains: Device #2: Intel's OpenCL runtime (GPU only) is currently broken. No devices found/left.
But it is possible to use GPU with v5.1.0 using option -D 2 --force
v5.1.0 took about 5 seconds.
info about detected OpenCL platforms/devices:
Not just slower, but about 200 times slower! Of course, with my specific hardware/software/hash.
I am new to Hashcat. I'm using Windows and a 10-year-old laptop with an Intel Celeron CPU and an Intel GPU.
This CPU is a 3rd generation Intel processor, codename IvyBridge.
https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/...pencl.html
I was not able to use hashcat on Linux so far. Every time I got an "illegal hardware instruction" error.
MACs are synthetic (not real), for educational purposes only. Details are here
v5.1.0 took about 5 seconds.
Code:
hashcat64.exe -D 1 -a 3 -m 16800 "ca5396d611cf330aebefd48ebbfb0e63*020000000001*020000000020*61703031" "12345678"
v6.2.5 took about 16 minutes.
Code:
hashcat.exe -D 1 -a 3 -m 22000 "WPA*01*ca5396d611cf330aebefd48ebbfb0e63*020000000001*020000000020*61703031***" "12345678"
or
hashcat.exe -D 1 --deprecated-check-disable -a 3 -m 16800 "ca5396d611cf330aebefd48ebbfb0e63*020000000001*020000000020*61703031" "12345678"
Most of the time of those 16 minutes I see this message on the screen: Initializing backend runtime for device #1. Please be patient...
-D 1 means use CPU, works for both versions of Hashcat
-D 2 means use GPU, doesn't work in my case for both versions
v6.2.5 complains: Device #2: Not enough allocatable device memory for this attack.
v5.1.0 complains: Device #2: Intel's OpenCL runtime (GPU only) is currently broken. No devices found/left.
But it is possible to use GPU with v5.1.0 using option -D 2 --force
v5.1.0 took about 5 seconds.
Code:
hashcat64.exe -D 2 --force -a 3 -m 16800 "ca5396d611cf330aebefd48ebbfb0e63*020000000001*020000000020*61703031" "12345678"
info about detected OpenCL platforms/devices:
Code:
C:\hashcat-5.1.0>hashcat64.exe -I
hashcat (v5.1.0) starting...
OpenCL Info:
Platform ID #1
Vendor : Intel(R) Corporation
Name : Intel(R) OpenCL
Version : OpenCL 1.2
Device ID #1
Type : CPU
Vendor ID : 8
Vendor : Intel(R) Corporation
Name : Intel(R) Celeron(R) CPU 1005M @ 1.90GHz
Version : OpenCL 1.2 (Build 76427)
Processor(s) : 2
Clock : 1900
Memory : 4067/16270 MB allocatable
OpenCL Version : OpenCL C 1.2
Driver Version : 3.0.1.10891
Device ID #2
Type : GPU
Vendor ID : 8
Vendor : Intel(R) Corporation
Name : Intel(R) HD Graphics
Version : OpenCL 1.2
Processor(s) : 6
Clock : 1000
Memory : 324/1297 MB allocatable
OpenCL Version : OpenCL C 1.2
Driver Version : 10.18.10.5161
Code:
C:\hashcat-6.2.5>hashcat.exe -I
hashcat (v6.2.5) starting in backend information mode
OpenCL Info:
============
OpenCL Platform ID #1
Vendor..: Intel(R) Corporation
Name....: Intel(R) OpenCL
Version.: OpenCL 1.2
Backend Device ID #1
Type...........: CPU
Vendor.ID......: 8
Vendor.........: Intel(R) Corporation
Name...........: Intel(R) Celeron(R) CPU 1005M @ 1.90GHz
Version........: OpenCL 1.2 (Build 76427)
Processor(s)...: 2
Clock..........: 1900
Memory.Total...: 16270 MB (limited to 2033 MB allocatable in one block)
Memory.Free....: 8103 MB
OpenCL.Version.: OpenCL C 1.2
Driver.Version.: 3.0.1.10891
Backend Device ID #2
Type...........: GPU
Vendor.ID......: 8
Vendor.........: Intel(R) Corporation
Name...........: Intel(R) HD Graphics
Version........: OpenCL 1.2
Processor(s)...: 6
Clock..........: 1000
Memory.Total...: 1297 MB (limited to 162 MB allocatable in one block)
Memory.Free....: 608 MB
OpenCL.Version.: OpenCL C 1.2
Driver.Version.: 10.18.10.5161
↧
What does it take to add an optimized kernel?
Assuming the following files are the kernels for -m0 (MD5):
There are no such "optimized" kernels for -m9400 (Office 2007). Why is that?
What is the meaning of a0, a1 and a3?
Trying to use an optimized kernel I get this message:
What does it take to add such a kernel if I were to create my own?
Code:
m00000_a0-optimized.cl
m00000_a0-pure.cl
m00000_a1-optimized.cl
m00000_a1-pure.cl
m00000_a3-optimized.cl
m00000_a3-pure.cl
There are no such "optimized" kernels for -m9400 (Office 2007). Why is that?
What is the meaning of a0, a1 and a3?
Trying to use an optimized kernel I get this message:
Code:
Kernel ./OpenCL/m09400-optimized.cl:
Optimized kernel requested, but not available or not required
Falling back to pure kernel
What does it take to add such a kernel if I were to create my own?
↧
Do i use the proper extracted data from my encrypted Truecrypt HDD for hashcat?
Hi @all,
first of all english is not my mother tongue.
In september 2019 I had a motorcyle accident with Traumatic Brain Injury (tbi), broken upper leg and impressions fracture lumbar vertebra nr. 4 (? i don't know if its the proper translation but something in my lower spin was injured) and ~1 and 1/2 months coma.
Due to the tbi i have no memories of the accident.
I lost the passwords to my encripted external hard drive created with Truecrypt and i do not know which version i had when encripting the external HDD but i know i could decrypt it with TrueCrypt 7.1a. I believe i created it with TrueCrypt 7.x in 2014-2016. I did not write the password down or saved it somewhere.
I justed pluged in the external HDD, open TrueCrypt and entered my password.
I believe i know parts of it because it used several other passwords combined to one long string. This string is at least 30 or 45 characters long.
After i was able to leave hospital and reha i tried to use TrueCrypt that was installed on my pc with the passwords i believed to be rigth, but no luck. Then i created a java program that would do the entering and checking for success automatically with a list of string (i m a developer myself), no luck. Then i heard about hashcat and read a bit in the internet then i tried my luck with hashcat, but so far i had no luck, obviously.
Encrypted external HDD info
Hashcat
Extracted data_to_hack(DATA)
Tests
I do no have another HDD so i was using a 32GB usb stick, encrypted it with TrueCrypt 7.1a with both algorithm mentioned above, extracted the DATA in the same way as written above, and it worked.
But it is not a HDD, and i do not exactly know if i used TrueCrypt 7.1a for encrypting so not exactly the same.
Questions
Just to be on the save side, i need confirmation that i used the correct data for hashcat even if do not know if encryption was done with TrueCrypt 7.1a or 7.x. or even 6.x - which i doubt but m not sure.
Do i m using the proper DATA?
Is the count=200 enough or do i need more?
Did i extract the correct data that is needed for my external HDD?
If i do not, can you point me to the correct way, please?
Yours
Anthony
first of all english is not my mother tongue.
In september 2019 I had a motorcyle accident with Traumatic Brain Injury (tbi), broken upper leg and impressions fracture lumbar vertebra nr. 4 (? i don't know if its the proper translation but something in my lower spin was injured) and ~1 and 1/2 months coma.
Due to the tbi i have no memories of the accident.
I lost the passwords to my encripted external hard drive created with Truecrypt and i do not know which version i had when encripting the external HDD but i know i could decrypt it with TrueCrypt 7.1a. I believe i created it with TrueCrypt 7.x in 2014-2016. I did not write the password down or saved it somewhere.
I justed pluged in the external HDD, open TrueCrypt and entered my password.
I believe i know parts of it because it used several other passwords combined to one long string. This string is at least 30 or 45 characters long.
After i was able to leave hospital and reha i tried to use TrueCrypt that was installed on my pc with the passwords i believed to be rigth, but no luck. Then i created a java program that would do the entering and checking for success automatically with a list of string (i m a developer myself), no luck. Then i heard about hashcat and read a bit in the internet then i tried my luck with hashcat, but so far i had no luck, obviously.
Encrypted external HDD info
- probably encrypted with TrueCrypt 7.x in 2014 - 2016
- Encryption algorithm AES-TWOFISH-SERPANT or SERPANT-TWOFISH-AES
- Hash Algorithm SHA-512 or RIPEMD-160
Hashcat
- used modes in the beginning RIPEMD-160 XTS 6211,6212,6213 and SHA-512 XTS 6221,6222, 6223
- latet only RIPEMD-160 XTS 6213 and SHA-512 XTS 6223
- e.g. hastcat.exe -a 3 -w 3 -m 6213 data_to_hack masks.file -o outputfile
Extracted data_to_hack(DATA)
- I extracted those DATA from my external HDD by using "rawwrite dd for windows version 0.5.".
- dd if=\\?\Device\HarddiskVolume10 of=blackToshiba.txt count=200
Tests
I do no have another HDD so i was using a 32GB usb stick, encrypted it with TrueCrypt 7.1a with both algorithm mentioned above, extracted the DATA in the same way as written above, and it worked.
But it is not a HDD, and i do not exactly know if i used TrueCrypt 7.1a for encrypting so not exactly the same.
Questions
Just to be on the save side, i need confirmation that i used the correct data for hashcat even if do not know if encryption was done with TrueCrypt 7.1a or 7.x. or even 6.x - which i doubt but m not sure.
Do i m using the proper DATA?
Is the count=200 enough or do i need more?
Did i extract the correct data that is needed for my external HDD?
If i do not, can you point me to the correct way, please?
Yours
Anthony
↧