Can't create an output-file for my cracked hashes

December 27, 2016, 10:31 am

≪ Previous: Uppler & Lower specific char?

I want to use hashcat to check against all my dictionaries in my folder (all of them end with .txt). The output should be saved in a seperate textfile (in my folder 'cracked').
I used this command:

Code:
hashcat -m 0 -a 0 -o ./cracked/test.txt hashlist.hash ./dictionaries/*.txt

Alright, i get some cracked hashes. But i don't get my test.txt file. Whats wrong with this command-line?

(Also i want to know, if its possible to get a text-file with cracked hashes + plaintext-passwords for each dictionaries - so not only one big list, but for example 5 list when i give hashcat 5 dictionaries, so i can check which cracked passwords are from which dictionary. Next thing, i searched for the pot.file. It should be in my hashcat binaries, but i cant find it there [use kali linux])

↧

Budget System Advice

December 28, 2016, 4:16 am

≫ Next: Help with KeePass and Hashcat

≪ Previous: Can't create an output-file for my cracked hashes

Hi all
Let me start of by saying I know cheap=expensive , but I am currently looking to build a budget system (local hardware prices and exchange rate in my country limit me) to upgrade my current rigs an i5 4th gen with Gt 740m , and a i5 4th Gen with an HD 6850 .
My budget is category for a graphics card is the RX 480 or GTX 1060 , I see the the 1060 benchmarks are already a vast improvement over my system , also if I go with a RX 480 and an A10 APU will Hashcat be able to utilize the cores in the APU or is the gain not worth it and Rather go with a Intel solution i5/i7 with the 1060 any advice would be appreciated Smile

↧

Help with KeePass and Hashcat

December 28, 2016, 7:15 am

≫ Next: Multiple output-files for every dictionary

≪ Previous: Budget System Advice

Hello,

I recently forgot my PW to my Keepass login and that is what brought me here. Below is what I have done so far. Any help anyone can provide would be greatly appreciated.

My keepass database is very small, only 3kb is size. My keyfile is simply called "key".

Exctracted Hash with keepass2john (not sure this formatted hash right -- can someone help):

C:\Users\Chris\Desktop\JohnRipper>keepass2john -i 98048 -k key dbbtc.kdb
0 [main] keepass2john 58680 find_fast_cwd: WARNING: Couldn't compute FAST_CWD pointer. Please report this problem to
the public mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com
key
Inlining dbbtc.kdb
dbbtc.kdb:$keepass$*1*50000*0*dc3119eb2777183b92d7e11ec49bcf7a*c358d61a2fe0dc7c1ee797d1257cd6cc25c20617161ee4c35aefa4e3f07378c8*45df2f3dca135f35db7120d11f4e4a41*83d3256c5add21970d5a79b03df8b317848906150c92b2e4d8746d7fb6755633*1*2512*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*1*2636*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

I had this file output to a "hash file" via this command - keepass2john -i 98048 -k key dbbtc.kdb > hash

When I load up hashcat and try to start cracking it, I get this error:

C:\Users\Chris\Desktop\HashCat>hashcat64.exe -m 13400 -a 0 -w 1 hash dic.txt
hashcat (v3.20) starting...

OpenCL Platform #1: NVIDIA Corporation
======================================
* Device #1: GeForce GTX 980, 1024/4096 MB allocatable, 16MCU

Hashfile 'hash' on line 1 (key): Line-length exception

No hashes loaded

↧

Multiple output-files for every dictionary

December 28, 2016, 10:33 am

≫ Next: WBB3 Woltlab Burning Board 3 with short salts: Line-length exception

≪ Previous: Help with KeePass and Hashcat

So i use this command to check all my dictionaries (all with the file extension .txt) against one hashlist and to get after that a textfile with the cracked hashes + plaintext-passwords:

Code:
hashcat -m 0 -a 0 -o crackedpasswords.txt hashlist.txt ./dictionaries/*.txt

This works fine. But i want an output like this: For every dicitonary, i get one output. For example: I use 3 dictionarys (a, b and c). After the calculation i get 3 output-files: cracked_a.txt, cracked_b.txt, cracked_c.txt.
With that command, i only get 'one big list' of cracked passwords.

Also, i'm looking for the pot.file. It should be in my hashcat binaries, but i cant find it there (i use kali linux with pre-installed hashcat v 3.10).

↧

WBB3 Woltlab Burning Board 3 with short salts: Line-length exception

December 28, 2016, 1:14 pm

≫ Next: Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Benchmark

≪ Previous: Multiple output-files for every dictionary

Hi guys,
first of all, thanks to atom for helping me last time and bringing this great project ahead!

So I got these hashes , which are sha1($salt.sha1($salt.sha1($pass))).
Now, if I don't get wrong, this hash should be equivalent to WBB3 Woltlab Burning Board 3.

However, mine have a much shorter salt than typical WBB3, here's an example in hash: salt: pass format:

Code:
e9af066d2c2fe7ce45035e89750d5702f938e935:25dc3e84a:110112

This fact leads of course to a Line-Length Exception error in hashcat.
Yet, the hash is for sure sha1($salt.sha1($salt.sha1($pass))) and can be decrypted in PasswordsPro, though it's dramatically slow.

Can anyone suggest me a workaround for this?

Thank you so much for your help!

↧

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Benchmark

December 28, 2016, 5:25 pm

≫ Next: Speed difference between brute and dictionary for very slow hashes (7-zip) ?

≪ Previous: WBB3 Woltlab Burning Board 3 with short salts: Line-length exception

Paid $150 new.

It's the EVGA model.

WPA/WPA2 at 120.7 kH/s

hashcat (v3.10) starting in benchmark-mode...

OpenCL Platform #1: NVIDIA Corporation
======================================
- Device #1: GeForce GTX 1050 Ti, 1009/4037 MB allocatable, 6MCU

OpenCL Platform #2: Mesa, skipped! No OpenCL compatible devices found

Hashtype: MD4

Speed.Dev.#1.: 11204.4 MH/s (95.82ms)

Hashtype: MD5

Speed.Dev.#1.: 6536.1 MH/s (96.19ms)

Hashtype: Half MD5

Speed.Dev.#1.: 4232.2 MH/s (95.99ms)

Hashtype: SHA1

Speed.Dev.#1.: 2524.5 MH/s (95.89ms)

Hashtype: SHA256

Speed.Dev.#1.:   823.8 MH/s (96.17ms)

Hashtype: SHA384

Speed.Dev.#1.:   295.6 MH/s (97.46ms)

Hashtype: SHA512

Speed.Dev.#1.:   315.1 MH/s (96.39ms)

Hashtype: SHA-3(Keccak)

Speed.Dev.#1.:   243.8 MH/s (97.48ms)

Hashtype: SipHash

Speed.Dev.#1.: 8441.4 MH/s (95.88ms)

Hashtype: RipeMD160

Speed.Dev.#1.: 1422.6 MH/s (95.02ms)

Hashtype: Whirlpool

Speed.Dev.#1.: 72242.1 kH/s (180.13ms)

Hashtype: GOST R 34.11-94

Speed.Dev.#1.: 70668.5 kH/s (142.37ms)

Hashtype: GOST R 34.11-2012 (Streebog) 256-bit

Speed.Dev.#1.: 14423.1 kH/s (352.64ms)

Hashtype: GOST R 34.11-2012 (Streebog) 512-bit

Speed.Dev.#1.: 14315.7 kH/s (354.42ms)

Hashtype: phpass, MD5(Wordpress), MD5(phpBB3), MD5(Joomla)

Speed.Dev.#1.: 2039.1 kH/s (96.98ms)

Hashtype: scrypt

Speed.Dev.#1.:   244.7 kH/s (12.21ms)

Hashtype: PBKDF2-HMAC-MD5

Speed.Dev.#1.: 2246.8 kH/s (94.23ms)

Hashtype: PBKDF2-HMAC-SHA1

Speed.Dev.#1.:   980.5 kH/s (78.12ms)

Hashtype: PBKDF2-HMAC-SHA256

Speed.Dev.#1.:   362.2 kH/s (83.31ms)

Hashtype: PBKDF2-HMAC-SHA512

Speed.Dev.#1.:   133.7 kH/s (87.30ms)

Hashtype: Skype

Speed.Dev.#1.: 3762.1 MH/s (96.20ms)

Hashtype: WPA/WPA2

Speed.Dev.#1.:   120.7 kH/s (93.41ms)

Hashtype: IKE-PSK MD5

Speed.Dev.#1.:   518.8 MH/s (95.44ms)

Hashtype: IKE-PSK SHA1

Speed.Dev.#1.:   236.8 MH/s (95.23ms)

Hashtype: NetNTLMv1-VANILLA / NetNTLMv1+ESS

Speed.Dev.#1.: 6599.3 MH/s (96.23ms)

Hashtype: NetNTLMv2

Speed.Dev.#1.:   477.7 MH/s (96.35ms)

Hashtype: IPMI2 RAKP HMAC-SHA1

Speed.Dev.#1.:   500.1 MH/s (96.53ms)

Hashtype: Kerberos 5 AS-REQ Pre-Auth etype 23

Speed.Dev.#1.: 83809.9 kH/s (107.43ms)

Hashtype: Kerberos 5 TGS-REP etype 23

Speed.Dev.#1.: 84303.3 kH/s (108.36ms)

Hashtype: DNSSEC (NSEC3)

Speed.Dev.#1.:   985.4 MH/s (97.29ms)

Hashtype: PostgreSQL Challenge-Response Authentication (MD5)

Speed.Dev.#1.: 1736.8 MH/s (96.84ms)

Hashtype: MySQL Challenge-Response Authentication (SHA1)

Speed.Dev.#1.:   694.7 MH/s (96.44ms)

Hashtype: SIP digest authentication (MD5)

Speed.Dev.#1.:   588.7 MH/s (98.41ms)

Hashtype: SMF > v1.1

Speed.Dev.#1.: 2008.6 MH/s (96.24ms)

Hashtype: vBulletin < v3.8.5

Speed.Dev.#1.: 1932.8 MH/s (100.82ms)

Hashtype: vBulletin > v3.8.5

Speed.Dev.#1.: 1424.8 MH/s (95.88ms)

Hashtype: IPB2+, MyBB1.2+

Speed.Dev.#1.: 1472.7 MH/s (95.95ms)

Hashtype: WBB3, Woltlab Burning Board 3

Speed.Dev.#1.:   391.6 MH/s (95.94ms)

Hashtype: OpenCart

Speed.Dev.#1.:   619.8 MH/s (96.49ms)

Hashtype: Joomla < 2.5.18

Speed.Dev.#1.: 6410.8 MH/s (95.75ms)

Hashtype: PHPS

Speed.Dev.#1.: 2045.0 MH/s (95.98ms)

Hashtype: Drupal7

Speed.Dev.#1.:    16845 H/s (96.11ms)

Hashtype: osCommerce, xt:Commerce

Speed.Dev.#1.: 3762.7 MH/s (95.76ms)

Hashtype: PrestaShop

Speed.Dev.#1.: 2137.7 MH/s (95.57ms)

Hashtype: Django (SHA-1)

Speed.Dev.#1.: 2017.8 MH/s (96.23ms)

Hashtype: Django (PBKDF2-SHA256)

Speed.Dev.#1.:    18359 H/s (95.79ms)

Hashtype: Mediawiki B type

Speed.Dev.#1.: 1859.8 MH/s (96.16ms)

Hashtype: Redmine Project Management Web App

Speed.Dev.#1.:   633.3 MH/s (96.68ms)

Hashtype: PostgreSQL

Speed.Dev.#1.: 6517.6 MH/s (96.93ms)

Hashtype: MSSQL(2000)

Speed.Dev.#1.: 2519.7 MH/s (96.05ms)

Hashtype: MSSQL(2005)

Speed.Dev.#1.: 2512.9 MH/s (96.32ms)

Hashtype: MSSQL(2012)

Speed.Dev.#1.:   301.4 MH/s (24.73ms)

Hashtype: MySQL323

Speed.Dev.#1.: 14143.1 MH/s (28.41ms)

Hashtype: MySQL4.1/MySQL5

Speed.Dev.#1.: 1130.0 MH/s (95.88ms)

Hashtype: Oracle H: Type (Oracle 7+)

Speed.Dev.#1.:   287.9 MH/s (117.47ms)

Hashtype: Oracle S: Type (Oracle 11+)

Speed.Dev.#1.: 2519.0 MH/s (96.07ms)

Hashtype: Oracle T: Type (Oracle 12+)

Speed.Dev.#1.:    32555 H/s (94.18ms)

Hashtype: Sybase ASE

Speed.Dev.#1.:   109.0 MH/s (96.91ms)

Hashtype: EPiServer 6.x < v4

Speed.Dev.#1.: 1893.2 MH/s (95.93ms)

Hashtype: EPiServer 6.x > v4

Speed.Dev.#1.:   743.9 MH/s (95.96ms)

Hashtype: md5apr1, MD5(APR), Apache MD5

Speed.Dev.#1.: 3023.9 kH/s (95.89ms)

Hashtype: ColdFusion 10+

Speed.Dev.#1.:   533.0 MH/s (95.12ms)

Hashtype: hMailServer

Speed.Dev.#1.:   741.8 MH/s (96.24ms)

Hashtype: SHA-1(Base64), nsldap, Netscape LDAP SHA

Speed.Dev.#1.: 2535.3 MH/s (95.48ms)

Hashtype: SSHA-1(Base64), nsldaps, Netscape LDAP SSHA

Speed.Dev.#1.: 2535.3 MH/s (95.48ms)

Hashtype: SSHA-512(Base64), LDAP {SSHA512}

Speed.Dev.#1.:   316.9 MH/s (96.35ms)

Hashtype: LM

Speed.Dev.#1.: 5890.6 MH/s (68.20ms)

Hashtype: NTLM

Speed.Dev.#1.: 11328.1 MH/s (96.01ms)

Hashtype: Domain Cached Credentials (DCC), MS Cache

Speed.Dev.#1.: 3231.7 MH/s (95.58ms)

Hashtype: Domain Cached Credentials 2 (DCC2), MS Cache 2

Speed.Dev.#1.:    98013 H/s (97.26ms)

Hashtype: MS-AzureSync PBKDF2-HMAC-SHA256

Speed.Dev.#1.: 3355.5 kH/s (44.65ms)

Hashtype: descrypt, DES(Unix), Traditional DES

Speed.Dev.#1.:   288.0 MH/s (95.43ms)

Hashtype: BSDiCrypt, Extended DES

Speed.Dev.#1.:   448.9 kH/s (121.26ms)

Hashtype: md5crypt, MD5(Unix), FreeBSD MD5, Cisco-IOS MD5

Speed.Dev.#1.: 3018.9 kH/s (96.06ms)

Hashtype: bcrypt, Blowfish(OpenBSD)

Speed.Dev.#1.:     4095 H/s (45.75ms)

Hashtype: sha256crypt, SHA256(Unix)

Speed.Dev.#1.:   114.2 kH/s (94.12ms)

Hashtype: sha512crypt, SHA512(Unix)

Speed.Dev.#1.:    45263 H/s (100.81ms)

Hashtype: OSX v10.4, v10.5, v10.6

Speed.Dev.#1.: 2010.3 MH/s (96.38ms)

Hashtype: OSX v10.7

Speed.Dev.#1.:   249.9 MH/s (95.09ms)

Hashtype: OSX v10.8+

Speed.Dev.#1.:     3818 H/s (95.97ms)

Hashtype: AIX {smd5}

Speed.Dev.#1.: 3025.4 kH/s (95.88ms)

Hashtype: AIX {ssha1}

Speed.Dev.#1.: 13866.8 kH/s (96.11ms)

Hashtype: AIX {ssha256}

Speed.Dev.#1.: 5156.9 kH/s (52.03ms)

Hashtype: AIX {ssha512}

Speed.Dev.#1.: 2011.5 kH/s (76.69ms)

Hashtype: Cisco-PIX MD5

Speed.Dev.#1.: 4844.8 MH/s (83.05ms)

Hashtype: Cisco-ASA MD5

Speed.Dev.#1.: 4840.7 MH/s (95.96ms)

Hashtype: Cisco-IOS SHA256

Speed.Dev.#1.:   795.5 MH/s (98.80ms)

Hashtype: Cisco $8$

Speed.Dev.#1.:    18233 H/s (96.93ms)

Hashtype: Cisco $9$

Speed.Dev.#1.:     5475 H/s (560.64ms)

Hashtype: Juniper Netscreen/SSG (ScreenOS)

Speed.Dev.#1.: 3762.3 MH/s (95.88ms)

Hashtype: Juniper IVE

Speed.Dev.#1.: 3010.4 kH/s (96.35ms)

Hashtype: Android PIN

Speed.Dev.#1.: 1630.5 kH/s (95.53ms)

Hashtype: Citrix NetScaler

Speed.Dev.#1.: 2179.1 MH/s (95.93ms)

Hashtype: RACF

Speed.Dev.#1.:   734.8 MH/s (108.24ms)

Hashtype: GRUB 2

Speed.Dev.#1.:    13228 H/s (95.66ms)

Hashtype: Radmin2

Speed.Dev.#1.: 2377.3 MH/s (95.87ms)

Hashtype: SAP CODVN B (BCODE)

Speed.Dev.#1.:   654.0 MH/s (119.20ms)

Hashtype: SAP CODVN F/G (PASSCODE)

Speed.Dev.#1.:   304.3 MH/s (113.65ms)

Hashtype: SAP CODVN H (PWDSALTEDHASH) iSSHA-1

Speed.Dev.#1.: 1812.7 kH/s (64.49ms)

Hashtype: Lotus Notes/Domino 5

Speed.Dev.#1.: 62030.7 kH/s (153.64ms)

Hashtype: Lotus Notes/Domino 6

Speed.Dev.#1.: 20379.9 kH/s (143.73ms)

Hashtype: Lotus Notes/Domino 8

Speed.Dev.#1.:   197.5 kH/s (95.23ms)

Hashtype: PeopleSoft

Speed.Dev.#1.: 2542.0 MH/s (95.36ms)

Hashtype: PeopleSoft PS_TOKEN

Speed.Dev.#1.:   920.8 MH/s (95.22ms)

Hashtype: 7-Zip

Speed.Dev.#1.:     2820 H/s (97.62ms)

Hashtype: WinZip

Speed.Dev.#1.:   331.6 kH/s (85.15ms)

Hashtype: RAR3-hp

Speed.Dev.#1.:    10037 H/s (76.41ms)

Hashtype: RAR5

Speed.Dev.#1.:    11213 H/s (95.76ms)

Hashtype: AxCrypt

Speed.Dev.#1.:    32975 H/s (251.37ms)

Hashtype: AxCrypt in memory SHA1

Speed.Dev.#1.: 2314.7 MH/s (95.91ms)

Hashtype: TrueCrypt PBKDF2-HMAC-RipeMD160 + XTS 512 bit

Speed.Dev.#1.:    82002 H/s (95.20ms)

Hashtype: TrueCrypt PBKDF2-HMAC-SHA512 + XTS 512 bit

Speed.Dev.#1.:   112.7 kH/s (88.99ms)

Hashtype: TrueCrypt PBKDF2-HMAC-Whirlpool + XTS 512 bit

Speed.Dev.#1.:    10600 H/s (278.04ms)

Hashtype: TrueCrypt PBKDF2-HMAC-RipeMD160 + XTS 512 bit + boot-mode

Speed.Dev.#1.:   154.5 kH/s (89.21ms)

Hashtype: VeraCrypt PBKDF2-HMAC-RipeMD160 + XTS 512 bit

Speed.Dev.#1.:      268 H/s (96.67ms)

Hashtype: VeraCrypt PBKDF2-HMAC-SHA512 + XTS 512 bit

Speed.Dev.#1.:      255 H/s (96.57ms)

Hashtype: VeraCrypt PBKDF2-HMAC-Whirlpool + XTS 512 bit

Speed.Dev.#1.:       21 H/s (285.49ms)

Hashtype: VeraCrypt PBKDF2-HMAC-RipeMD160 + XTS 512 bit + boot-mode

Speed.Dev.#1.:      535 H/s (96.80ms)

Hashtype: VeraCrypt PBKDF2-HMAC-SHA256 + XTS 512 bit

Speed.Dev.#1.:      368 H/s (95.97ms)

Hashtype: VeraCrypt PBKDF2-HMAC-SHA256 + XTS 512 bit + boot-mode

Speed.Dev.#1.:      920 H/s (95.97ms)

Hashtype: Android FDE <= 4.3

Speed.Dev.#1.:   242.2 kH/s (95.57ms)

Hashtype: Android FDE (Samsung DEK)

Speed.Dev.#1.:    89330 H/s (92.52ms)

Hashtype: eCryptfs

Speed.Dev.#1.:     4148 H/s (92.51ms)

Hashtype: MS Office <= 2003 MD5 + RC4, oldoffice$0, oldoffice$1

Speed.Dev.#1.: 65727.3 kH/s (106.12ms)

Hashtype: MS Office <= 2003 MD5 + RC4, collision-mode #1

Speed.Dev.#1.: 94455.7 kH/s (111.89ms)

Hashtype: MS Office <= 2003 SHA1 + RC4, oldoffice$3, oldoffice$4

Speed.Dev.#1.: 86265.5 kH/s (109.31ms)

Hashtype: MS Office <= 2003 SHA1 + RC4, collision-mode #1

Speed.Dev.#1.: 97696.6 kH/s (111.13ms)

Hashtype: Office 2007

Speed.Dev.#1.:    39309 H/s (96.72ms)

Hashtype: Office 2010

Speed.Dev.#1.:    19632 H/s (97.23ms)

Hashtype: Office 2013

Speed.Dev.#1.:     2731 H/s (96.29ms)

Hashtype: PDF 1.1 - 1.3 (Acrobat 2 - 4)

Speed.Dev.#1.: 98131.3 kH/s (108.64ms)

Hashtype: PDF 1.1 - 1.3 (Acrobat 2 - 4) + collider-mode #1

Speed.Dev.#1.:   108.4 MH/s (111.20ms)

Hashtype: PDF 1.4 - 1.6 (Acrobat 5 - 8)

Speed.Dev.#1.: 4880.7 kH/s (39.01ms)

Hashtype: PDF 1.7 Level 3 (Acrobat 9)

Speed.Dev.#1.:   826.9 MH/s (96.01ms)

Hashtype: PDF 1.7 Level 8 (Acrobat 10 - 11)

Speed.Dev.#1.:    10345 H/s (420.56ms)

Hashtype: Password Safe v2

Speed.Dev.#1.:    97081 H/s (51.97ms)

Hashtype: Password Safe v3

Speed.Dev.#1.:   361.9 kH/s (95.12ms)

Hashtype: Lastpass

Speed.Dev.#1.:   714.7 kH/s (72.81ms)

Hashtype: 1Password, agilekeychain

Speed.Dev.#1.:   984.5 kH/s (72.46ms)

Hashtype: 1Password, cloudkeychain

Speed.Dev.#1.:     3338 H/s (96.04ms)

Hashtype: Bitcoin/Litecoin wallet.dat

Speed.Dev.#1.:     1345 H/s (96.58ms)

Hashtype: Blockchain, My Wallet

Speed.Dev.#1.: 22708.9 kH/s (33.31ms)

Hashtype: Keepass 1 (AES/Twofish) and Keepass 2 (AES)

Speed.Dev.#1.:    40422 H/s (263.29ms)

Hashtype: ArubaOS

Speed.Dev.#1.: 2010.2 MH/s (95.97ms)

Started: Wed Dec 28 17:01:36 2016
Stopped: Wed Dec 28 17:21:51 2016

↧

Speed difference between brute and dictionary for very slow hashes (7-zip) ?

December 29, 2016, 1:03 am

≫ Next: The speed varies between 1300 KH / s and 608 KH / s

≪ Previous: Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Benchmark

Hi!

Why there is so big difference between bruteforce attack mode and dictionary attack mode exist for very slow algorithms ?
Particular I mean 7-zip hash calculation.

My GTX750 is able to get 1049 H/s in bruteforce and 210 H/s in dictionary.

I read all involved wiki topics:
"How to create more work for full speed?"
"Why is my attack so slow?"
"Why does hashcat says it has only 2% GPU utilization?"

There is some explanation for fast (md5 - many MH/s) and slow (scrypt - many kH/s).
But what is wrong with very slow 7-zip hash (several hundreds H/s) ?

There is almost none traffic for 7-zip, just around 100 kB/s, isn't it ?
GPU is utilized 100% and produce only 210 H/s (5 ms period).
PCIe delays is about 5 - 10 us. So delays are 1000 times lower.

Is there any pipeline block in 7-zip hash calculation?
Speed difference is equal 5 times (1049/210). So maybe there is 5-stage pipeline which could not work with dictionary attack ?

I'm not saying that this is good or bad.
Just want to know a some technical details about why this happens, if possible of couse.

Thanks a lot!

↧

The speed varies between 1300 KH / s and 608 KH / s

December 29, 2016, 4:19 am

≫ Next: Keyspace List for WPA on Default Routers

≪ Previous: Speed difference between brute and dictionary for very slow hashes (7-zip) ?

Hello I have question about the speed.
The speed varies between 1300 KH / s and 608 KH / s.
Where does it come from?

greetings
Tuxel
Sorry for my bad English

Session..........: hashcat
Status...........: Running
Hash.Type........: WPA/WPA2
Hash.Target......: /home/schmidt/hashcat-3.20/hash.liste
Time.Started.....: Thu Dec 29 12:44:45 2016 (6 mins, 42 secs)
Time.Estimated...: Sat Feb 29 22:38:07 2020 (389418 years, 298 days)
Input.Mask.......: ?1?1?1?1?1?1?1?1?1?1?1?1?1?1?1?1 [16]
Input.Charset....: -1 ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ0123456789, -2 Undefined, -3 Undefined, -4 Undefined
Input.Queue......: 1/1 (100.00%)
Speed.Dev.#1.....:   929.7 kH/s (394.80ms)
Speed.Dev.#2.....:   443.2 kH/s (268.08ms)
Speed.Dev.#*.....: 1372.9 kH/s
Recovered........: 0/35 (0.00%) Digests, 0/35 (0.00%) Salts
Progress.........: 399245312/16871200686279229440 (0.00%)
Rejected.........: 0/399245312 (0.00%)
Restore.Point....: 0/452598034045687125 (0.00%)
Candidates.#1....: T234567898888989 -> TFLE777898888989
Candidates.#2....: DV03VANANANANANA -> DTYU120123456611
HWMon.Dev.#1.....: Temp: 47c Fan: 0% Util:100% Core:1873Mhz Mem:4513Mhz Lanes:16
HWMon.Dev.#2.....: Temp: 36c Fan: 0% Util:100% Core:1455Mhz Mem:3004Mhz Lanes:16

Session..........: hashcat
Status...........: Running
Hash.Type........: WPA/WPA2
Hash.Target......: /home/schmidt/hashcat-3.20/hash.liste
Time.Started.....: Thu Dec 29 12:44:45 2016 (18 mins, 8 secs)
Time.Estimated...: Sat Feb 29 22:49:33 2020 (876509 years, 279 days)
Input.Mask.......: ?1?1?1?1?1?1?1?1?1?1?1?1?1?1?1?1 [16]
Input.Charset....: -1 ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ0123456789, -2 Undefined, -3 Undefined, -4 Undefined
Input.Queue......: 1/1 (100.00%)
Speed.Dev.#1.....:   413.0 kH/s (394.74ms)
Speed.Dev.#2.....:   197.0 kH/s (271.21ms)
Speed.Dev.#*.....:   609.9 kH/s
Recovered........: 0/35 (0.00%) Digests, 0/35 (0.00%) Salts
Progress.........: 817823744/16871200686279229440 (0.00%)
Rejected.........: 0/817823744 (0.00%)
Restore.Point....: 0/452598034045687125 (0.00%)
Candidates.#1....: T234567898888989 -> TFLE777898888989
Candidates.#2....: XV03VANANANANANA -> XTYU120123456611
HWMon.Dev.#1.....: Temp: 47c Fan: 0% Util:100% Core:1885Mhz Mem:4513Mhz Lanes:16
HWMon.Dev.#2.....: Temp: 36c Fan: 0% Util:100% Core:1455Mhz Mem:3004Mhz Lanes:16

↧

Keyspace List for WPA on Default Routers

December 29, 2016, 5:05 pm

≫ Next: Nvidia GTX GPU not working

≪ Previous: The speed varies between 1300 KH / s and 608 KH / s

↧

Nvidia GTX GPU not working

December 30, 2016, 4:05 am

≫ Next: Notebook computer how to install the video card driver

≪ Previous: Keyspace List for WPA on Default Routers

Hi guys,

pretty new here

so im having problems with running hashcat with my Nvidia graphics, currently running 1 Titan X Pascal

i have installed these:

//kali setup
apt-get install nvidia-kernel-dkms
sed 's/quiet/quiet nouveau.modeset=0/g' -i /etc/default/grub
///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////

apt install nvidia-opencl-icd
apt install nvidia-cuda-toolkit nvidia-opencl-icd
apt install libxnvctrl-dev
apt install nvidia-opencl-dev
apt install libgmp3-dev
apt install libgmp10-doc
apt install opencl-headers
apt-get install nvidia-xconfig
apt-get install nvidia-settings
nvidia-xconfig
apt-get install nvidia-kernel-$(uname -r)
apt-get install nvidia-detect
apt-get install nvidia-libopencl1
apt-get install gtk2.0

apt-get install nvidia-cuda-*

also tried changing the xorg.config file but im still unable to run hashcat with my GPU why???? very frustrated

right now nothing seems to want to run with the GPU, although i have check that it renders

Please help... or maybe suggest alternatives

Thanks Smile

Scatchy

↧

Notebook computer how to install the video card driver

December 30, 2016, 5:27 am

≫ Next: Old hardware: how to run outdated oclhashcat

≪ Previous: Nvidia GTX GPU not working

Multi-card environment, how to configure kali

↧

Old hardware: how to run outdated oclhashcat

December 30, 2016, 2:33 pm

≫ Next: Interesting situation, zipfile password protected, and extracted.

≪ Previous: Notebook computer how to install the video card driver

I have a Windows 10 system with 2 AMD GPU's: HD 5450 and HD 7700. The latest AMD driver that will support them is 15.11. The current versions of hashcat are documented to require AMD 15.12 or later. I've tried both 3.00 and 3.20 and they both fail with a "hashcat64.exe has stopped working" popup error message.

Roughly a year ago I was able to successfully use oclhashcat64.exe with this hardware, but I now get the message "ERROR: This copy of oclHashcat is outdated. Get a more recent version."

Is there a way to bypass the error and continue to use the old oclhashcat that does work with my hardware? or is there a way to use the newer versions with this hardware?

↧

Interesting situation, zipfile password protected, and extracted.

December 31, 2016, 11:22 am

≫ Next: hashcat (v3.20) almost half slower vs cudaHashcat v2.01

≪ Previous: Old hardware: how to run outdated oclhashcat

So imagine the following situation

You zipped & password protected some files and you have the original folder.
Anyway to figure out what the password was using hashcat?

↧

hashcat (v3.20) almost half slower vs cudaHashcat v2.01

January 1, 2017, 3:37 am

≫ Next: Why would the list run only on Linux?

≪ Previous: Interesting situation, zipfile password protected, and extracted.

C:\hashcat-3.20>hashcat64.exe -m 2500 -b
hashcat (v3.20) starting in benchmark mode...

* Device #1: Old CUDA chipset 3.0 detected, OpenCL performance is reduced.
             For ideal hashcat performance on NVIDIA GPU you need Shader Model 5.0 or higher
nvmlDeviceGetCurrPcieLinkWidth(): Not Supported

nvmlDeviceGetClockInfo(): Not Supported

nvmlDeviceGetFanSpeed(): Not Supported

nvmlDeviceGetClockInfo(): Not Supported

nvmlDeviceGetTemperatureThreshold(): Not Supported

nvmlDeviceGetTemperatureThreshold(): Not Supported

nvmlDeviceGetUtilizationRates(): Not Supported

nvmlDeviceGetPowerManagementLimit(): Not Supported

OpenCL Platform #1: NVIDIA Corporation
======================================
* Device #1: GeForce GTX 780M, 1024/4096 MB allocatable, 8MCU

OpenCL Platform #2: Intel(R) Corporation
========================================
* Device #2: Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-4700HQ CPU @ 2.40GHz, skipped

Hashtype: WPA/WPA2

Speed.Dev.#1.....:    25503 H/s (79.99ms)

Started: Sun Jan 01 12:29:49 2017
Stopped: Sun Jan 01 12:29:59 2017

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

C:\cudaHashcat-2.01>cudaHashcat64.exe -m 2500 -b
cudaHashcat v2.01 starting in benchmark-mode...

Device #1: GeForce GTX 780M, 4096MB, 797Mhz, 8MCU

Hashtype: WPA/WPA2
Workload: 1024 loops, 32 accel

Speed.GPU.#1.:    44128 H/s

Started: Sun Jan 01 12:28:19 2017
Stopped: Sun Jan 01 12:28:38 2017

↧

Why would the list run only on Linux?

January 1, 2017, 3:39 am

≫ Next: Sequence of Mask Attack?

≪ Previous: hashcat (v3.20) almost half slower vs cudaHashcat v2.01

Hello everyone,

For some reasons I have to use hashcat on both Kali and windows 10. The issue is that the wordlist runs fine on Kali, but on windows all the candidates are hex values and unreadable charts. This applies for all the candidates and only for this newly made wordlist, previously everything went great on both Kali and windows (well, thanks Atom!). I tried to inject a known password to the wordlist but still it wasn't recognized by hashcat. I used iconv on Kali to convert the wordlist to ASCII, UTF-8, and others but no luck (sometimes I see only the rules and no words at all). I tried to use MS word and online encoding services to figure it out but also nothing worked.

The newly made wordlist is made via web-crawling apps such as wordhound and cewl and also via manual search in web pages and copy/paste. Originally it contained many languages (Chinese, Russian, Arabic, and u name it!) but they were cleaned (manually, by sorting it and deleting words in the beginning and end of the list) and I only kept European languages (exception is Russia). It was originally made in the Kali machine. Size of the list is 1.5 MB

This is the first customized wordlist I make so I wonder what did I miss?

↧

Sequence of Mask Attack?

January 2, 2017, 2:55 pm

≫ Next: Installing OpenCL for OCLhashcat

≪ Previous: Why would the list run only on Linux?

Is there a way to stack a sequence of mask attacks? Something like...

Code:
hashcat64 -m 0 test.txt -a 3 ?d?d?d?d?d ?d?d?d?d?u ?d?d?d?d?d?l

where it will run one mask after another? I understand that this specific mask I could've easily done ?d?d?d?d?a or ?d?d?d?d?1 -1=?u?d?l, but I'm just thinking if the hash is longer and I know there is only 1 ?s in the hash (without knowing its position), might be more time efficient to run a stacked mask attack.

Thanks!

↧

Installing OpenCL for OCLhashcat

January 2, 2017, 3:39 pm

≫ Next: We have the cards, now what?

≪ Previous: Sequence of Mask Attack?

I have read pretty much every post I can find in the forum about this, so I apologize if this is a redo. I'm brand new to the forum, and I'm trying to figure out how to correctly install Hashcat for my Intel CPU usage.

I'm running Kali on a Macbook late 2015 (cause who needs MacOS these days right?)

Followed steps on this forum and others and ended up with this error:

Code:
hashcat (v3.20-88-gd36cc4c5) starting...

clGetDeviceIDs(): CL_DEVICE_NOT_FOUND

clGetDeviceIDs(): CL_DEVICE_NOT_FOUND

No devices found/left

Started: Mon Jan  2 17:23:21 2017

Stopped: Mon Jan  2 17:23:21 2017

root@einstein:~#

I have tar'd and installed the OpenCL drivers (to the best of my knowledge). I've been using Aircrack and WPS+Pixie for most of my cracks, I would like to explore more with Hashcat and oclhashcat.

Thanks!

↧

We have the cards, now what?

January 3, 2017, 11:56 am

≫ Next: Core i5 750 & gtx 1060

≪ Previous: Installing OpenCL for OCLhashcat

As simple and as short as possible, in order to get the maximum out of our 4x1070 FE cards, which:
Motherboard (how many PCI x16/x8) to get?
CPU (minimum cores/gen?) Xeon/I7?

And in case we use a server, we got this offer:
1 x Intel® Xeon® Processor E5-2609 v4
8 x 16GB DDR4 1.2V-2400
1 x 800GB SSD
3 x HGST 6TB 3.5-inch 7200 SATA
4 x Gainward GeForce GTX 1070 Phoenix 8GB GDDR5 PCIE 3.0 x16

Thank you!

↧

Core i5 750 & gtx 1060

January 3, 2017, 4:31 pm

≫ Next: Hashcat with free drivers on Linux?

≪ Previous: We have the cards, now what?

Hello.

I have a processor core i5 750 overclocked to 4,3ghz and motherboard asus p7p55. I want to buy msi gtx 1060.
Will my processor unlock the full potential of this video card? (~ 200k wpa pass).

↧

Hashcat with free drivers on Linux?

January 3, 2017, 5:04 pm

≫ Next: GPG PassPhrase recovery

≪ Previous: Core i5 750 & gtx 1060

Hello, everyone.
I'd like to know will hashcat work on any of free drivers(nouveau/amdgpu) in the near future? Is it possible to run it somehow not on amdgpu-pro/ati-drivers/nvidia-drivers atm? Or I should forget about my "wet dreams" and use some of proprietary drivers just for the one tool? Maybe someone from the hashcat-staff can share that kind of info?
Thanks for the answers.

↧