Well i thought that if i buy a 280X i would double h/s in oclhashcat
the R9 280X (2048 Stream Processors Tahiti) on wpa2 @ 1050 Mhz clock= 147.4 kH/s
vs
the R9 270X (1024 Stream Processors Pitcairn) on wpa2 @ 1050 Mhz clock= 92,000 h/s
i'll get better performance with 2
R9 270X (1024 Stream Processors Pitcairn) on wpa2 @ 1050 Mhz clock= 2 X 92,000 h/s= 184,000 h/s
anybody else experience that?
is it because of the processor is different Tahiti vs Pitcairn?
Tia
the R9 280X (2048 Stream Processors Tahiti) on wpa2 @ 1050 Mhz clock= 147.4 kH/s
vs
the R9 270X (1024 Stream Processors Pitcairn) on wpa2 @ 1050 Mhz clock= 92,000 h/s
i'll get better performance with 2
R9 270X (1024 Stream Processors Pitcairn) on wpa2 @ 1050 Mhz clock= 2 X 92,000 h/s= 184,000 h/s
anybody else experience that?
is it because of the processor is different Tahiti vs Pitcairn?
Tia